» Articles » PMID: 28356149

Disparities in Receipt of Recommended Care Among Younger Versus Older Medicare Beneficiaries: a Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Mar 31
PMID 28356149
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although health disparities have been documented between Medicare beneficiaries based on age (<65 years vs. older age groups), underuse of recommended medical care in younger beneficiaries has not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we aim to identify and characterize vulnerabilities of the younger Medicare age group (aged <65 years) in relation to older age groups (aged 65-74 years and ≥75 years) and to explore age group as a determinant of use of recommended care among Medicare beneficiaries.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey between 2001 and 2008 (N = 30,117). Age group characteristics were compared using cross-sectional data at baseline. During follow-up, we assessed the association between age and receipt of recommended care on 38 recommended care indicators, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Follow-up periods differed by component indicator.

Results: At baseline, a higher proportion of younger beneficiaries experienced social disadvantage, disability and certain morbidities than older age groups. During follow-up, younger beneficiaries were significantly less likely to receive overall recommended care compared to those 65-74 years of age (adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.70-0.80). In addition, male gender, non-Hispanic black race, less than high school education, living alone, with children or with others, psychiatric disorders and higher activity limitation stages were all associated with underuse of recommended care.

Conclusions: Younger Medicare beneficiary status appears to be an independent risk factor for underuse of appropriate care. Support to ameliorate disparities in different social and health aspects may be warranted.

Citing Articles

Marginalized two part model for analyzing multilevel semicontinuous medical costs in Iranian households.

Daghaghele E, Angali K, Kamyari N, Seyedtabib M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7491.

PMID: 40032955 PMC: 11876334. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91309-0.


Comparison of Ambulatory Care Access and Quality for Beneficiaries With Disabilities Covered by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare Insurance.

Johnston K, Wen H, Pollack H JAMA Health Forum. 2022; 3(1):e214562.

PMID: 35977235 PMC: 8903104. DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4562.


Changes in screening colonoscopy following Medicare reimbursement and cost-sharing changes.

Song L, Newhouse J, Garcia-De-Albeniz X, Hsu J Health Serv Res. 2019; 54(4):839-850.

PMID: 30941767 PMC: 6606542. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13150.

References
1.
Cubanski J, Neuman P . Medicare doesn't work as well for younger, disabled beneficiaries as it does for older enrollees. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(9):1725-33. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0962. View

2.
Dansky K, Brannon D, Shea D, Vasey J, Dirani R . Profiles of hospital, physician, and home health service use by older persons in rural areas. Gerontologist. 1998; 38(3):320-30. DOI: 10.1093/geront/38.3.320. View

3.
Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold M, Clancy C . Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2000; 283(19):2579-84. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.19.2579. View

4.
Betancourt J, Green A, Carrillo J, Ananeh-Firempong 2nd O . Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public Health Rep. 2003; 118(4):293-302. PMC: 1497553. DOI: 10.1093/phr/118.4.293. View

5.
Bjorkenstam E, Ljung R, Burstrom B, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Hallqvist J, Ringback Weitoft G . Quality of medical care and excess mortality in psychiatric patients--a nationwide register-based study in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2012; 2:e000778. PMC: 3289986. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000778. View