» Articles » PMID: 28355365

The Acceptability of Vaginal Smear Self-collection for Screening for Cervical Cancer: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 30
PMID 28355365
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cervical cancer is a major cause of death in adult women. However, many women do not undergo cervical cancer screening for the following reasons: fear, shame, physical limitations, cultural or religious considerations and lack of access to health care services. Self-collected vaginal smears maybe an alternative means of including more women in cervical cancer screening programs. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the acceptability of vaginal smear self-collection for cervical cancer screening. We selected articles from PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase that were published between January 1995 and April 2016. Studies written in English, French, Italian, Portuguese or Spanish that involved women between 18 and 69 years of age who had engaged in sexual intercourse were included in this review. The review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. Nineteen studies were ultimately evaluated in this review. Most of the included studies (n=17) demonstrated that the self-collection method exhibited outstanding acceptability among women with respect to cervical cancer screening, and only two studies indicated that self-collection exhibited low acceptability among women in this context. The acceptability of self-collection was determined subjectively (without standardized questionnaires) in 10 studies (53%) and via structured and validated questionnaires in the remaining studies. The results of our review suggest that the self-collection method is well-accepted and may therefore encourage greater participation in cervical cancer screening programs. However, additional studies are required to verify these results.

Citing Articles

Acceptability of self-sampling and self-testing for infections: a rapid systematic review on public users' views.

Borek A, Roleston C, Lazzarino R, Cooray M, Hayward G, Roberts N BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):695.

PMID: 39972444 PMC: 11841015. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21773-w.


Human papillomavirus self-sampling versus provider-sampling in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of accuracy, acceptability, cost, uptake, and equity.

Otieno J, Were L, Nyanchoka M, Olwanda E, Mulaku M, Sem X Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1439164.

PMID: 39678248 PMC: 11638174. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1439164.


Questionnaire-Based Study on the Knowledge of Cervical Cancer and Attitude and Perception Toward Self-Sampling Method of Screening, Among Women in Sikkim, India.

Lucksom P, Sherpa M, Pradhan A, Sherpa M J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024; 74(4):364-370.

PMID: 39280202 PMC: 11399509. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-024-02049-6.


Development and validation of an HPV infection knowledge assessment scale among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.

Sethi S, Ribeiro Santiago P, Soares G, Ju X, Antonsson A, Canfell K Vaccine X. 2023; 14:100317.

PMID: 37288370 PMC: 10241973. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100317.


Self-Collection Cervical Screening in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Scoping Review of Implementation Evidence.

Creagh N, Boyd L, Bavor C, Zammit C, Saunders T, Oommen A JCO Glob Oncol. 2023; 9:e2200297.

PMID: 36724416 PMC: 10166429. DOI: 10.1200/GO.22.00297.


References
1.
Dareng E, Jedy-Agba E, Bamisaye P, Isa Modibbo F, Oyeneyin L, Adewole A . Influence of Spirituality and Modesty on Acceptance of Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening. PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0141679. PMC: 4631343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141679. View

2.
Racey C, Gesink D, Burchell A, Trivers S, Wong T, Rebbapragada A . Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015; 25(5):489-97. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5348. View

3.
Penaranda E, Molokwu J, Hernandez I, Salaiz R, Nguyen N, Byrd T . Attitudes toward self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among primary care attendees living on the US-Mexico border. South Med J. 2014; 107(7):426-32. DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000132. View

4.
Sultana F, Mullins R, Murphy M, English D, Simpson J, Drennan K . Women's views on human papillomavirus self-sampling: focus groups to assess acceptability, invitation letters and a test kit in the Australian setting. Sex Health. 2015; 12(4):279-86. DOI: 10.1071/SH14236. View

5.
Wong E, Chan P, Chor J, Cheung A, Huang F, Wong S . Evaluation of the Impact of Human Papillomavirus DNA Self-sampling on the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening. Cancer Nurs. 2015; 39(1):E1-E11. PMC: 4892762. DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000241. View