» Articles » PMID: 28353614

Using Health-system-wide Data to Understand Hepatitis B Virus Prophylaxis and Reactivation Outcomes in Patients Receiving Rituximab

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 30
PMID 28353614
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in the setting of rituximab use is a potentially fatal but preventable safety event. The rate of HBV screening and proportion of patients at risk who receive antiviral prophylaxis in patients initiating rituximab is unknown.We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from 2 health systems, a university center and a safety net health system, including diagnosis grouper codes, problem lists, medications, laboratory results, procedures codes, clinical encounter notes, and scanned documents. We identified all patients who received rituximab between 6/1/2012 and 1/1/2016. We calculated the proportion of rituximab users with inadequate screening for HBV according to the Centers for Disease Control guidelines for detecting latent HBV infection before their first rituximab infusion during the study period. We also assessed the proportion of patients with positive hepatitis B screening tests who were prescribed antiviral prophylaxis. Finally, we characterized safety failures and adverse events.We included 926 patients from the university and 132 patients from the safety net health system. Sixty-one percent of patients from the university had adequate screening for HBV compared with 90% from the safety net. Among patients at risk for reactivation based on results of HBV testing, 66% and 92% received antiviral prophylaxis at the university and safety net, respectively.We found wide variations in hepatitis B screening practices among patients receiving rituximab, resulting in unnecessary risks to patients. Interventions should be developed to improve patient safety procedures in this high-risk patient population.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Safety of Rituximab (Risks of Viral and Opportunistic Infections).

Varley C, Winthrop K Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021; 23(9):74.

PMID: 34269903 PMC: 8284038. DOI: 10.1007/s11926-021-01037-3.


RISE registry reveals potential gaps in medication safety for new users of biologics and targeted synthetic DMARDs.

Schmajuk G, Li J, Evans M, Anastasiou C, Izadi Z, Kay J Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020; 50(6):1542-1548.

PMID: 32234243 PMC: 7501140. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.03.003.


Using Process Improvement and Systems Redesign to Improve Rheumatology Care Quality in a Safety Net Clinic.

Aguirre A, Trupin L, Margaretten M, Goglin S, Noh J, Yazdany J J Rheumatol. 2020; 47(11):1712-1720.

PMID: 32062597 PMC: 7429246. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.190472.


Gaps in Ambulatory Patient Safety for Immunosuppressive Specialty Medications.

Patterson S, Schmajuk G, Evans M, Aggarwal I, Izadi Z, Gianfrancesco M Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019; 45(5):348-357.

PMID: 30686706 PMC: 7433663. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.12.003.


Management of anti-HBc-positive patients with rheumatic diseases treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-a single-center analysis of 2054 patients.

Schwaneck E, Krone M, Kreissl-Kemmer S, Weissbrich B, Weiss J, Tony H Clin Rheumatol. 2018; 37(11):2963-2970.

PMID: 30238380 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4295-8.


References
1.
Yeo W, Chan T, Leung N, Lam W, Mo F, Chu M . Hepatitis B virus reactivation in lymphoma patients with prior resolved hepatitis B undergoing anticancer therapy with or without rituximab. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 27(4):605-11. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0182. View

2.
Dervite I, Hober D, Morel P . Acute hepatitis B in a patient with antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen who was receiving rituximab. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(1):68-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200101043440120. View

3.
Lok A, McMahon B . Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatology. 2009; 50(3):661-2. DOI: 10.1002/hep.23190. View

4.
Weinbaum C, Williams I, Mast E, Wang S, Finelli L, Wasley A . Recommendations for identification and public health management of persons with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008; 57(RR-8):1-20. View

5.
Deyo R, Cherkin D, Ciol M . Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45(6):613-9. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8. View