» Articles » PMID: 28350929

Effect of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Cancer Incidence in Older Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 29
PMID 28350929
Citations 114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Evidence suggests that low vitamin D status may increase the risk of cancer.

Objective: To determine if dietary supplementation with vitamin D3 and calcium reduces the risk of cancer among older women.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A 4-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, population-based randomized clinical trial in 31 rural counties (June 24, 2009, to August 26, 2015-the final date of follow-up). A total of 2303 healthy postmenopausal women 55 years or older were randomized, 1156 to the treatment group and 1147 to the placebo group. Duration of treatment was 4 years.

Interventions: The treatment group (vitamin D3 + calcium group) received 2000 IU/d of vitamin D3 and 1500 mg/d of calcium; the placebo group received identical placebos.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of all-type cancer (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers), which was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and proportional hazards modeling.

Results: Among 2303 randomized women (mean age, 65.2 years [SD, 7.0]; mean baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, 32.8 ng/mL [SD, 10.5]), 2064 (90%) completed the study. At year 1, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were 43.9 ng/mL in the vitamin D3 + calcium group and 31.6 ng/mL in the placebo group. A new diagnosis of cancer was confirmed in 109 participants, 45 (3.89%) in the vitamin D3 + calcium group and 64 (5.58%) in the placebo group (difference, 1.69% [95% CI, -0.06% to 3.46%]; P = .06). Kaplan-Meier incidence over 4 years was 0.042 (95% CI, 0.032 to 0.056) in the vitamin D3 + calcium group and 0.060 (95% CI, 0.048 to 0.076) in the placebo group; P = .06. In unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, the hazard ratio was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.02). Adverse events potentially related to the study included renal calculi (16 participants in the vitamin D3 + calcium group and 10 in the placebo group), and elevated serum calcium levels (6 in the vitamin D3 + calcium group and 2 in the placebo group).

Conclusions And Relevance: Among healthy postmenopausal older women with a mean baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of 32.8 ng/mL, supplementation with vitamin D3 and calcium compared with placebo did not result in a significantly lower risk of all-type cancer at 4 years. Further research is necessary to assess the possible role of vitamin D in cancer prevention.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01052051.

Citing Articles

Expert consensus on vitamin D in osteoporosis.

Lei S, Zhang X, Song L, Wen J, Zhang Z, Tian J Ann Jt. 2025; 10:1.

PMID: 39981430 PMC: 11836767. DOI: 10.21037/aoj-24-48.


Vitamin D: Evidence-Based Health Benefits and Recommendations for Population Guidelines.

Grant W, Wimalawansa S, Pludowski P, Cheng R Nutrients. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39861407 PMC: 11767646. DOI: 10.3390/nu17020277.


Effects of vitamin D supplementation on cardiac biomarkers: Results from the STURDY trial.

Rainer K, Earle W, Michos E, Miller E, Wanigatunga A, Rebuck H Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025; 20:100871.

PMID: 39850664 PMC: 11755341. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100871.


Integrating Endocrine, Genomic, and Extra-Skeletal Benefits of Vitamin D into National and Regional Clinical Guidelines.

Wimalawansa S, Weiss S, Hollis B Nutrients. 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39599755 PMC: 11597479. DOI: 10.3390/nu16223969.


Association of standardized serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D with falls in post-menopausal women.

Binkley N, Sempos C, Borchardt G, Larsen J, Stacey M, Mosiman S Osteoporos Int. 2024; 36(2):255-264.

PMID: 39585370 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07310-2.