» Articles » PMID: 28348637

Automated Classification of Severity in Cardiac Dyssynchrony Merging Clinical Data and Mechanical Descriptors

Overview
Publisher Hindawi
Date 2017 Mar 29
PMID 28348637
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves functional classification among patients with left ventricle malfunction and ventricular electric conduction disorders. However, a high percentage of subjects under CRT (20%-30%) do not show any improvement. Nonetheless the presence of mechanical contraction dyssynchrony in ventricles has been proposed as an indicator of CRT response. This work proposes an automated classification model of severity in ventricular contraction dyssynchrony. The model includes clinical data such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), QRS and P-R intervals, and the 3 most significant factors extracted from the factor analysis of dynamic structures applied to a set of equilibrium radionuclide angiography images representing the mechanical behavior of cardiac contraction. A control group of 33 normal volunteers (28 ± 5 years, LVEF of 59.7% ± 5.8%) and a HF group of 42 subjects (53.12 ± 15.05 years, LVEF < 35%) were studied. The proposed classifiers had hit rates of 90%, 50%, and 80% to distinguish between absent, mild, and moderate-severe interventricular dyssynchrony, respectively. For intraventricular dyssynchrony, hit rates of 100%, 50%, and 90% were observed distinguishing between absent, mild, and moderate-severe, respectively. These results seem promising in using this automated method for clinical follow-up of patients undergoing CRT.

References
1.
Piamjariyakul U, Yadrich D, Russell C, Myer J, Prinyarux C, Vacek J . Patients' annual income adequacy, insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses related to heart failure care. Heart Lung. 2014; 43(5):469-75. PMC: 4150850. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.013. View

2.
Menet A, Guyomar Y, Ennezat P, Graux P, Castel A, Delelis F . Prognostic value of left ventricular reverse remodeling and performance improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective study. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 204:6-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.091. View

3.
Botvinick E . Scintigraphic blood pool and phase image analysis: the optimal tool for the evaluation of resynchronization therapy. J Nucl Cardiol. 2003; 10(4):424-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(03)00526-9. View

4.
Komajda M, Lam C . Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a clinical dilemma. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(16):1022-32. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu067. View

5.
Cavailloles F, Bazin J, Pavel D, Olea E, Faraggi M, Frouin F . Comparison between factor analysis of dynamic structures and Fourier analysis in detection of segmental wall motion abnormalities: a clinical evaluation. Int J Card Imaging. 1995; 11(4):263-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF01145195. View