Comprehensive Track-structure Based Evaluation of DNA Damage by Light Ions from Radiotherapy-relevant Energies Down to Stopping

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2017 Mar 28

PMID 28345622

Citations 68

Authors

W Friedland

E Schmitt

P Kundrat

M Dingfelder

G Baiocco

S Barbieri

A Ottolenghi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Track structures and resulting DNA damage in human cells have been simulated for hydrogen, helium, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and neon ions with 0.25-256 MeV/u energy. The needed ion interaction cross sections have been scaled from those of hydrogen; Barkas scaling formula has been refined, extending its applicability down to about 10 keV/u, and validated against established stopping power data. Linear energy transfer (LET) has been scored from energy deposits in a cell nucleus; for very low-energy ions, it has been defined locally within thin slabs. The simulations show that protons and helium ions induce more DNA damage than heavier ions do at the same LET. With increasing LET, less DNA strand breaks are formed per unit dose, but due to their clustering the yields of double-strand breaks (DSB) increase, up to saturation around 300 keV/μm. Also individual DSB tend to cluster; DSB clusters peak around 500 keV/μm, while DSB multiplicities per cluster steadily increase with LET. Remarkably similar to patterns known from cell survival studies, LET-dependencies with pronounced maxima around 100-200 keV/μm occur on nanometre scale for sites that contain one or more DSB, and on micrometre scale for megabasepair-sized DNA fragments.

Citing Articles

Mapping neutron biological effectiveness for DNA damage induction as a function of incident energy and depth in a human sized phantom.

Mentana A, Quaresima V, Kundrat P, Guardamagna I, Lonati L, Iaria O Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2209.

PMID: 39820036 PMC: 11739508. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85879-2.

Significance of the proton energy loss mechanism to gold nanoparticles in proton therapy: a Geant4 simulation.

Tabbakh F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24978.

PMID: 39443616 PMC: 11499847. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76244-w.

Renormalization of radiobiological response functions by energy loss fluctuations and complexities in chromosome aberration induction: deactivation theory for proton therapy from cells to tumor control.

Abolfath R, Helo Y, Bronk L, Carabe A, Grosshans D, Mohan R Eur Phys J D At Mol Opt Phys. 2024; 73(3).

PMID: 39148557 PMC: 11325099. DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2019-90263-5.

Quantitative analysis of dose dependent DNA fragmentation in dry pBR322 plasmid using long read sequencing and Monte Carlo simulations.

Beaudier P, Zein S, Chatzipapas K, Tran H, Deves G, Plawinski L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18650.

PMID: 39134627 PMC: 11319478. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69406-3.

Lithium inelastic cross-sections and their impact on micro and nano dosimetry of boron neutron capture.

D-Kondo N, Ortiz R, Faddegon B, Incerti S, Tran H, Francis Z Phys Med Biol. 2024; 69(14).

PMID: 38964312 PMC: 11271803. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad5f72.

References

Charlton D, Nikjoo H, Humm J . Calculation of initial yields of single- and double-strand breaks in cell nuclei from electrons, protons and alpha particles. Int J Radiat Biol. 1989; 56(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1080/09553008914551141. View

Davidkova M, Kundrat P, Stepan V, Palajova Z, Judas L . Lethal events in V79 cells irradiated by low-energy protons and correlations with distribution patterns of energy deposition, radical concentration and DNA damage. Appl Radiat Isot. 2008; 67(3):454-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.06.035. View

Emfietzoglou D, Karava K, Papamichael G, Moscovitch M . Monte-Carlo calculations of radial dose and restricted-let for protons in water. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004; 110(1-4):871-9. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch163. View

Dale R, Jones B, Carabe-Fernandez A . Why more needs to be known about RBE effects in modern radiotherapy. Appl Radiat Isot. 2008; 67(3):387-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.06.013. View

Georgakilas A, ONeill P, Stewart R . Induction and repair of clustered DNA lesions: what do we know so far?. Radiat Res. 2013; 180(1):100-9. DOI: 10.1667/RR3041.1. View

Friedrich T, Durante M, Scholz M . Modeling cell survival after photon irradiation based on double-strand break clustering in megabase pair chromatin loops. Radiat Res. 2012; 178(5):385-94. DOI: 10.1667/RR2964.1. View

Baiocco G, Barbieri S, Babini G, Morini J, Alloni D, Friedland W . The origin of neutron biological effectiveness as a function of energy. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:34033. PMC: 5032018. DOI: 10.1038/srep34033. View

Friedland W, Paretzke H, Ballarini F, Ottolenghi A, Kreth G, Cremer C . First steps towards systems radiation biology studies concerned with DNA and chromosome structure within living cells. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2008; 47(1):49-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-007-0152-x. View

Liamsuwan T, Nikjoo H . Cross sections for bare and dressed carbon ions in water and neon. Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(3):641-72. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/3/641. View

10.

Friedland W, Dingfelder M, Kundrat P, Jacob P . Track structures, DNA targets and radiation effects in the biophysical Monte Carlo simulation code PARTRAC. Mutat Res. 2011; 711(1-2):28-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.01.003. View

11.

Schmitt E, Friedland W, Kundrat P, Dingfelder M, Ottolenghi A . Cross-section scaling for track structure simulations of low-energy ions in liquid water. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015; 166(1-4):15-8. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv302. View

12.

Alloni D, Campa A, Friedland W, Mariotti L, Ottolenghi A . Integration of Monte Carlo simulations with PFGE experimental data yields constant RBE of 2.3 for DNA double-strand break induction by nitrogen ions between 125 and 225 keV/μm LET. Radiat Res. 2013; 179(6):690-7. DOI: 10.1667/R3043.1. View

13.

Friedrich T, Durante M, Scholz M . Particle species dependence of cell survival RBE: Evident and not negligible. Acta Oncol. 2013; 52(3):589-603. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.767984. View

14.

Nikjoo H, ONeill P, Wilson W, Goodhead D . Computational approach for determining the spectrum of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res. 2001; 156(5 Pt 2):577-83. DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0577:cafdts]2.0.co;2. View

15.

Kundrat P . A semi-analytical radiobiological model may assist treatment planning in light ion radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(23):6813-30. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/23/003. View

16.

Kreipl M, Friedland W, Paretzke H . Interaction of ion tracks in spatial and temporal proximity. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2009; 48(4):349-59. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-009-0234-z. View

17.

Alloni D, Baiocco G, Babini G, Friedland W, Kundrat P, Mariotti L . Energy dependence of the complexity of DNA damage induced by carbon ions. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015; 166(1-4):86-90. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv292. View

18.

Brahme A . Recent advances in light ion radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 58(2):603-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.034. View

19.

Verkhovtsev A, Surdutovich E, Solovyov A . Multiscale approach predictions for biological outcomes in ion-beam cancer therapy. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:27654. PMC: 4906349. DOI: 10.1038/srep27654. View

20.

Schmid T, Friedland W, Greubel C, Girst S, Reindl J, Siebenwirth C . Sub-micrometer 20MeV protons or 45MeV lithium spot irradiation enhances yields of dicentric chromosomes due to clustering of DNA double-strand breaks. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2015; 793:30-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.07.015. View