» Articles » PMID: 28342082

Quantitative Characterization of Pore Structure of Several Biochars with 3D Imaging

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Mar 26
PMID 28342082
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pore space characteristics of biochars may vary depending on the used raw material and processing technology. Pore structure has significant effects on the water retention properties of biochar amended soils. In this work, several biochars were characterized with three-dimensional imaging and image analysis. X-ray computed microtomography was used to image biochars at resolution of 1.14 μm and the obtained images were analysed for porosity, pore size distribution, specific surface area and structural anisotropy. In addition, random walk simulations were used to relate structural anisotropy to diffusive transport. Image analysis showed that considerable part of the biochar volume consist of pores in size range relevant to hydrological processes and storage of plant available water. Porosity and pore size distribution were found to depend on the biochar type and the structural anisotopy analysis showed that used raw material considerably affects the pore characteristics at micrometre scale. Therefore, attention should be paid to raw material selection and quality in applications requiring optimized pore structure.

Citing Articles

Potentials of urban waste derived biochar in minimizing heavy metal bioavailability: A techno-economic review.

Pattnaik B, Behera R, Chandra Santra S, Choudhury S, Biswas J, Hossain A iScience. 2025; 28(3):111915.

PMID: 40040805 PMC: 11879596. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111915.


Exploring the Relationship Between Biochar Pore Structure and Microbial Community Composition in Promoting Tobacco Growth.

Yang L, Li S, Ahmed W, Jiang T, Mei F, Hu X Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39519871 PMC: 11548322. DOI: 10.3390/plants13212952.


4D structural changes and pore network model of biomass during pyrolysis.

Edeh I, Masek O, Fusseis F Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22863.

PMID: 38129628 PMC: 10739905. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49919-z.


The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite.

Spitalniak M, Bogacz A, Zieba Z Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(21).

PMID: 34772181 PMC: 8587147. DOI: 10.3390/ma14216658.


Synchrotron X-ray microtomography and multifractal analysis for the characterization of pore structure and distribution in softwood pellet biochar.

Srocke F, Han L, Dutilleul P, Xiao X, Smith D, Masek O Biochar. 2021; 3(4):671-686.

PMID: 34723132 PMC: 8545715. DOI: 10.1007/s42773-021-00104-3.


References
1.
Rawal A, Joseph S, Hook J, Chia C, Munroe P, Donne S . Mineral-Biochar Composites: Molecular Structure and Porosity. Environ Sci Technol. 2016; 50(14):7706-14. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00685. View

2.
Tabor Z, Rokita E . Quantifying anisotropy of trabecular bone from gray-level images. Bone. 2006; 40(4):966-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.10.022. View

3.
Bubici S, Korb J, Kucerik J, Conte P . Evaluation of the surface affinity of water in three biochars using fast field cycling NMR relaxometry. Magn Reson Chem. 2016; 54(5):365-70. DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4391. View

4.
Conte P, Nestle N . Water dynamics in different biochar fractions. Magn Reson Chem. 2015; 53(9):726-34. DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4204. View

5.
Eibisch N, Schroll R, Fuss R, Mikutta R, Helfrich M, Flessa H . Pyrochars and hydrochars differently alter the sorption of the herbicide isoproturon in an agricultural soil. Chemosphere. 2014; 119:155-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.059. View