» Articles » PMID: 28341685

Use of a Computerised Decision Aid (DA) to Inform the Decision Process on Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage II Colorectal Cancer: Development and Preliminary Evaluation

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 26
PMID 28341685
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To develop a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer, and examine perceived usefulness, acceptability and areas for improvement of the DA.

Design: Mixed methods.

Setting: Single outpatient oncology department in central London.

Participants: Consecutive recruitment of 13 patients with stage II colorectal cancer, 12 of whom completed the study. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years; complete resection for stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; patients within 14-56 days after surgery; no contraindication to adjuvant chemotherapy; able to give written informed consent. Exclusion criterion: previous chemotherapy.

Primary Outcomes: Patient perceived usefulness (assessed by the PrepDM questionnaire) and acceptability of the DA.

Results: PrepDM scores, measuring the perceived usefulness of the DA in preparing the patient to communicate with their doctor and make a health decision, were above those reported in other patient groups. Patient acceptability scores were also high; however, interviews showed that there was evidence of a lack of understanding of key information among some patients, in particular their baseline risk of recurrence, the net benefit of combination chemotherapy and the rationale for having chemotherapy when cancer had apparently gone.

Conclusions: Patients found the DA acceptable and useful in supporting their decision about whether or not to have adjuvant chemotherapy. Suggested improvements for the DA include: sequential presentation of treatment options (eg, no treatment vs 1 drug, 1 drug vs 2 drugs) to enhance patient understanding of the difference between combination and single therapy, diagrams to help patients understand the rationale for chemotherapy to prevent a recurrence and inbuilt checks on patient understanding of baseline risk of recurrence and net benefit of chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Current Status of Shared Decision-Making in Intraocular Lens Selection for Cataract Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Dai J, Hua Y, Chen Y, Huang J, Zhang X, Sun Y Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:1311-1321.

PMID: 38947871 PMC: 11212811. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S468452.


Experiences of Using Patient Decision Aids for Decisions About Cancer Treatment: A Meta-Aggregation of Qualitative Studies.

Longcoy L, Mathew A, Jang M, Mayahara M, Doorenbos A Cancer Nurs. 2023; 48(2):81-88.

PMID: 37430415 PMC: 10782815. DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001263.


Computer-Based Decision Tools for Shared Therapeutic Decision-making in Oncology: Systematic Review.

Yung A, Kay J, Beale P, Gibson K, Shaw T JMIR Cancer. 2021; 7(4):e31616.

PMID: 34544680 PMC: 8579220. DOI: 10.2196/31616.


Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Collee G, van der Wilk B, van Lanschot J, Busschbach J, Timmermans L, Lagarde S Curr Oncol Rep. 2020; 22(10):101.

PMID: 32725550 PMC: 7387328. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-00962-3.


OpenClinical.net: Artificial intelligence and knowledge engineering at the point of care.

Fox J, South M, Khan O, Kennedy C, Ashby P, Bechtel J BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020; 27(2).

PMID: 32723855 PMC: 7388886. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100141.


References
1.
Bennett C, Graham I, Kristjansson E, Kearing S, Clay K, OConnor A . Validation of a preparation for decision making scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 78(1):130-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.012. View

2.
Teufel A, Gerken M, Hartl J, Itzel T, Fichtner-Feigl S, Stroszczynski C . Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T4 UICC II colon cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15:419. PMC: 4451874. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1404-9. View

3.
Duric V, Stockler M, Heritier S, Boyle F, Beith J, Sullivan A . Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: what makes AC and CMF worthwhile now?. Ann Oncol. 2005; 16(11):1786-94. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi370. View

4.
Trevena L, Davey H, Barratt A, Butow P, Caldwell P . A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006; 12(1):13-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00596.x. View

5.
Elwyn G, OConnor A, Bennett C, Newcombe R, Politi M, Durand M . Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One. 2009; 4(3):e4705. PMC: 2649534. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004705. View