» Articles » PMID: 28340103

Diagnosis-to-ablation Time As a Predictor of Success: Early Choice for Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Long-term Outcome in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from the Middelheim-PVI Registry

Overview
Journal Europace
Date 2017 Mar 25
PMID 28340103
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The aim of the study is to define long-term outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) and to determine whether time window between AF diagnosis and PVI affects outcome.

Methods And Results: Consecutive AF patients undergoing PVI (2006-14) were followed for 5 years. Primary outcome was clinical success, defined as freedom of documented AF without anti-arrhythmic drugs respecting a 1-month blanking period. A 1000 patients were included (age 60 ± 10 years, CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 ± 1). The cohort was divided in four quartiles (Q) according to the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT): Q1 DAT 0-11 months (N = 244), Q2 DAT 12-≤33 months (N = 254), Q3 DAT 34-≤70 months (N = 252) and Q4 DAT 71-360 months (N = 250). Mean follow-up was 44.3±21.0 months. At 5 years, clinical success was achieved in 45.2 ± 2.0% of patients. Independent predictors of clinical success were AF type (HR = 0.61; 95%CI 0.50-0.74; P < 0.0001), left atrial size (HR = 1.03; 95%CI 1.02-1.05; P < 0.0001), DAT (HR = 1.00; 95%CI 1.00-1.00; P = 0.001), ablation technique (P = 0.012), and year of ablation (HR = 0.93; 95%CI 0.86-1.00; P = 0.045) in multivariable-adjusted analysis. The highest clinical success was achieved when PVI was performed within the first year, and gradually declined with increasing DAT: 55.9 ± 4.6% for Q1, 46.9 ± 4.0% for Q2, 45.5 ± 3.6% for Q3, and 35.5 ± 3.6% for Q4 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Long-term success rate of PVI is 45.2 ± 2.0%. Shorter diagnosis-to-ablation times are associated with better clinical success. Our data advocate for early PVI following diagnosis of AF.

Citing Articles

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(6):1217-1354.

PMID: 39669937 PMC: 11632303. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13082.


Temporal trends of catheter ablation procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: A nationwide cohort study.

Lappalainen A, Hartikainen J, Teppo K, Halminen O, Aro A, Siponen R Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024; 55:101541.

PMID: 39507295 PMC: 11539521. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101541.


Invasive strategies for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation: a narrative review.

Kim H, Lee C J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2024; 41(4):279-287.

PMID: 39307574 PMC: 11534407. DOI: 10.12701/jyms.2024.00703.


Early versus Late Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: Timing Matters.

Farghaly A, Ali H, Lupo P, Foresti S, De Ambroggi G, Atta S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200784 PMC: 11354874. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164643.


Effects of antiarrhythmic drug responsiveness and diagnosis-to-ablation time on outcomes after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Kim H, Kim D, Kim K, Choi S, Kim M, Park J J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(4):867-878.

PMID: 39139899 PMC: 11317675. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13104.