» Articles » PMID: 28338503

Efficacy and Safety of Crystalline Valsartan/Sacubitril (LCZ696) Compared With Placebo and Combinations of Free Valsartan and Sacubitril in Patients With Systolic Hypertension: The RATIO Study

Overview
Date 2017 Mar 25
PMID 28338503
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We compared the systolic blood pressure (SBP)-lowering efficacy and safety of crystalline valsartan/sacubitril (LCZ696, an angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor) 400 mg daily against valsartan (320 mg once daily) alone or coadministered with placebo or increasing doses of free sacubitril (50, 100, 200, or 400 mg once daily) to identify the optimal antihypertensive combination dose. This multicenter, double-blinded, 7-arm parallel-group study recruited patients with mild-to-moderate systolic hypertension (office SBP 150-179 mm Hg). Primary-dependent variable was change in office SBP from baseline to week 8. At entry (n = 907), mean age was 61.5 years, sitting office BP 160/90.2 mm Hg, and mean 24-hour ambulatory BP 142/82.1 mm Hg; 852 participants completed the study. At week 8, there were greater reductions in sitting office SBP and 24-hour ambulatory SBP with LCZ696 400 mg than with valsartan 320 mg (-5.7 and -3.4 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.05 each). The SBP reduction with LCZ696 400 daily was similar to coadministered free valsartan 320 mg and sacubitril 200 mg. Effects were similar in those older and younger than 65 years, and active therapies had adverse event rates similar to placebo. We conclude that crystalline valsartan/sacubitril 400 mg daily (1) is superior to valsartan 320 mg daily for lowering SBP, (2) has similar efficacy to the combination of free valsartan 320 mg plus free sacubitril 200 mg, (3) represents the optimal dosage for systolic hypertension in patients of any age, and (4) is safe and well tolerated.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Allisartan for the Treatment of Primary Hypertension.

Zhang W, Zhang J, Yan J, Ge Q, Lu X, Chen S JACC Asia. 2024; 4(9):697-707.

PMID: 39371627 PMC: 11450957. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.06.002.


Antihypertensive Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan: An Updated Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Raja R, Kumari S, Khan M, Ayaz A, Jaffar D, Mohamad Z Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e48692.

PMID: 38090459 PMC: 10715627. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48692.


Twenty-Four-Hour Blood Pressure-Lowering Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan in Japanese Patients With Essential Hypertension Based on Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping Status: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data From a Randomized,....

Kario K, Rakugi H, Yarimizu D, Morita Y, Eguchi S, Iekushi K J Am Heart Assoc. 2023; 12(8):e027612.

PMID: 37026551 PMC: 10227270. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027612.


Network meta-analysis of sacubitril/valsartan for the treatment of essential hypertension.

Zhang Y, Zhao X, Huang H, Li M Clin Res Cardiol. 2022; 112(7):855-867.

PMID: 36326841 PMC: 10293449. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02120-0.


Sacubitril-valsartan for the treatment of hypertension in China: A cost-utility analysis based on meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Lou Y, Yu Y, Liu J, Huang J Front Public Health. 2022; 10:959139.

PMID: 36062091 PMC: 9432800. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.959139.