» Articles » PMID: 28337806

The Pharmacological Profile of a Novel Highly Potent Bisphosphonate, OX14 (1-Fluoro-2-(Imidazo-[1,2-α]Pyridin-3-yl)-Ethyl-Bisphosphonate)

Abstract

Bisphosphonates are widely used in the treatment of clinical disorders characterized by increased bone resorption, including osteoporosis, Paget's disease, and the skeletal complications of malignancy. The antiresorptive potency of the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates on bone in vivo is now recognized to depend upon two key properties, namely mineral binding affinity and inhibitory activity on farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS), and these properties vary independently of each other in individual bisphosphonates. The better understanding of structure activity relationships among the bisphosphonates has enabled us to design a series of novel bisphosphonates with a range of mineral binding properties and antiresorptive potencies. Among these is a highly potent bisphosphonate, 1-fluoro-2-(imidazo-[1,2 alpha]pyridin-3-yl)-ethyl-bisphosphonate, also known as OX14, which is a strong inhibitor of FPPS, but has lower binding affinity for bone mineral than most of the commonly studied bisphosphonates. The aim of this work was to characterize OX14 pharmacologically in relation to several of the bisphosphonates currently used clinically. When OX14 was compared to zoledronate (ZOL), risedronate (RIS), and minodronate (MIN), it was as potent at inhibiting FPPS in vitro but had significantly lower binding affinity to hydroxyapatite (HAP) columns than ALN, ZOL, RIS, and MIN. When injected i.v. into growing Sprague Dawley rats, OX14 was excreted into the urine to a greater extent than the other bisphosphonates, indicating reduced short-term skeletal uptake and retention. In studies in both Sprague Dawley rats and C57BL/6J mice, OX14 inhibited bone resorption, with an antiresorptive potency equivalent to or greater than the comparator bisphosphonates. In the JJN3-NSG murine model of myeloma-induced bone disease, OX14 significantly prevented the formation of osteolytic lesions (p < 0.05). In summary, OX14 is a new, highly potent bisphosphonate with lower bone binding affinity than other clinically relevant bisphosphonates. This renders OX14 an interesting potential candidate for further development for its potential skeletal and nonskeletal benefits. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Citing Articles

Rapid assessment of the osteogenic capacity of hydroxyapatite/aragonite using a murine tibial periosteal ossification model.

Steijvers E, Shi Y, Lu H, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zhao F Bioact Mater. 2024; 45:257-273.

PMID: 39659725 PMC: 11629149. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.11.025.


Effect of denosumab on renal function in women with osteoporosis evaluated using cystatin C.

Ohishi T, Fujita T, Nishida T, Hagiwara K, Murai R, Matsuyama Y Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2022; 8(2):68-74.

PMID: 35832419 PMC: 9263171. DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2022.05.002.


Bisphosphonates: The role of chemistry in understanding their biological actions and structure-activity relationships, and new directions for their therapeutic use.

Ebetino F, Sun S, Cherian P, Roshandel S, Neighbors J, Hu E Bone. 2021; 156:116289.

PMID: 34896359 PMC: 11023620. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116289.


Ibandronate sodium and zoledronate sodium in the treatment of senile osteoporosis: efficacy, impact on quality of life and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Liang S, Hu S, Guo H, Dong L, Liu G, Liu Y Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(3):1764-1771.

PMID: 33841700 PMC: 8014411.


Targeting prenylation inhibition through the mevalonate pathway.

Manaswiyoungkul P, de Araujo E, Gunning P RSC Med Chem. 2021; 11(1):51-71.

PMID: 33479604 PMC: 7485146. DOI: 10.1039/c9md00442d.


References
1.
Morgan G, Child J, Gregory W, Szubert A, Cocks K, Bell S . Effects of zoledronic acid versus clodronic acid on skeletal morbidity in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(8):743-52. PMC: 3148431. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70157-7. View

2.
Tonogai I, Goto T, Hamada D, Iwame T, Yoshioka S, Tsutsui T . Bilateral atypical femoral fractures in a patient with multiple myeloma treated with intravenous bisphosphonate therapy. Case Rep Orthop. 2014; 2014:452418. PMC: 4129925. DOI: 10.1155/2014/452418. View

3.
Leu C, Luegmayr E, Freedman L, Rodan G, Reszka A . Relative binding affinities of bisphosphonates for human bone and relationship to antiresorptive efficacy. Bone. 2005; 38(5):628-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.023. View

4.
Iwamoto J, Okano H, Furuya T, Urano T, Hasegawa M, Hirabayashi H . Patient preference for monthly bisphosphonate versus weekly bisphosphonate in a cluster-randomized, open-label, crossover trial: Minodroate Alendronate/Risedronate Trial in Osteoporosis (MARTO). J Bone Miner Metab. 2015; 34(2):201-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-015-0653-7. View

5.
Lawson M, Xia Z, Barnett B, Triffitt J, Phipps R, Dunford J . Differences between bisphosphonates in binding affinities for hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009; 92(1):149-55. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31500. View