» Articles » PMID: 28336741

Differences Between Determinants of In-hospital Mortality and Hospitalisation Costs for Patients with Acute Heart Failure: a Nationwide Observational Study from Japan

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 25
PMID 28336741
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Although current case-mix classifications in prospective payment systems were developed to estimate patient resource usage, whether these classifications reflect clinical outcomes remains unknown. The efficient management of acute heart failure (AHF) with high mortality is becoming more important in many countries as its prevalence and associated costs are rapidly increasing. Here, we investigate the determinants of in-hospital mortality and hospitalisation costs to clarify the impact of severity factors on these outcomes in patients with AHF, and examine the level of agreement between the predicted values of mortality and costs.

Design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Setting And Participants: A total of 19 926 patients with AHF from 261 acute care hospitals in Japan were analysed using administrative claims data.

Main Outcome Measures: Multivariable logistic regression analysis and linear regression analysis were performed to examine the determinants of in-hospital mortality and hospitalisation costs, respectively. The independent variables were grouped into patient condition on admission, postadmission procedures indicating disease severity (eg, intra-aortic balloon pumping) and other high-cost procedures (eg, single-photon emission CT). These groups of independent variables were cumulatively added to the models, and their effects on the models' abilities to predict the respective outcomes were examined. The level of agreement between the quartiles of predicted mortality and predicted costs was analysed using Cohen's κ coefficient.

Results: In-hospital mortality was associated with patient's condition on admission and severity-indicating procedures (C-statistics 0.870), whereas hospitalisation costs were associated with severity-indicating procedures and high-cost procedures (R 0.32). There were substantial differences in determinants between the outcomes. In addition, there was no consistent relationship observed (κ=0.016, p<0.0001) between the quartiles of in-hospital mortality and hospitalisation costs.

Conclusions: The determinants of mortality and costs for hospitalised patients with AHF were generally different. Our results indicate that the same case-mix classifications should not be used to predict both these outcomes.

Citing Articles

In-Hospital Outcomes of Heart Failure Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: Insights from Real-World Claims Data.

Izumi C, Matsuyama R, Yamabe K, Iwasaki K, Takeshima T, Murphy S Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023; 15:349-360.

PMID: 37223825 PMC: 10202112. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S405079.


Cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiac implantable electronic devices with reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing.

Noda T, Ueda N, Tanaka Y, Ishiguro Y, Matsumoto T, Uenishi T Europace. 2023; 25(3):1087-1099.

PMID: 36691793 PMC: 10062312. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad003.


Burden of Repeated Hospitalizations on Patients with Heart Failure: An Analysis of Administrative and Claims Data in Japan.

Eguchi S, Morita Y, Mitani H, Kanegasaki A, Iwasaki K, Yoshikawa T Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022; 9(3):377-389.

PMID: 35753032 PMC: 9392661. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-022-00315-5.


Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Initiating Type 2 Diabetes Therapy with a Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Versus Conventional Therapy in Japan.

Igarashi A, Maruyama-Sakurai K, Kubota A, Akiyama H, Yajima T, Kohsaka S Diabetes Ther. 2022; 13(7):1367-1381.

PMID: 35710646 PMC: 9240120. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01270-8.


Microalbuminuria and its Prognostic Significance in Patients with Acute Heart Failure with Preserved, Mid-Range, and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Alatas O, Biteker M, Demir A, Yildirim B, Acar E, Gokcek K Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022; 118(4):703-709.

PMID: 35137781 PMC: 9007018. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20201144.


References
1.
McMahon Jr L, Billi J . Measurement of severity of illness and the Medicare prospective payment system: state of the art and future directions. J Gen Intern Med. 1988; 3(5):482-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF02595926. View

2.
McMahon Jr L, Newbold R . Variation in resource use within diagnosis-related groups. The effect of severity of illness and physician practice. Med Care. 1986; 24(5):388-97. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198605000-00002. View

3.
Stargardt T, Schreyogg J, Kondofersky I . Measuring the relationship between costs and outcomes: the example of acute myocardial infarction in German hospitals. Health Econ. 2013; 23(6):653-69. DOI: 10.1002/hec.2941. View

4.
Smith D, Johnson E, Blough D, Thorp M, Yang X, Petrik A . Predicting costs of care in heart failure patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:434. PMC: 3527310. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-434. View

5.
Iezzoni L, Ash A, Shwartz M, Daley J, HUGHES J, Mackiernan Y . Predicting who dies depends on how severity is measured: implications for evaluating patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123(10):763-70. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-10-199511150-00004. View