» Articles » PMID: 28335663

Universal and Particular in Morphological Processing: Evidence from Hebrew

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2017 Mar 25
PMID 28335663
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Do properties of individual languages shape the mechanisms by which they are processed? By virtue of their non-concatenative morphological structure, the recognition of complex words in Semitic languages has been argued to rely strongly on morphological information and on decomposition into root and pattern constituents. Here, we report results from a masked priming experiment in Hebrew in which we contrasted verb forms belonging to two morphological classes, Paal and Piel, which display similar properties, but crucially differ on whether they are extended to novel verbs. Verbs from the open-class Piel elicited familiar root priming effects, but verbs from the closed-class Paal did not. Our findings indicate that, similarly to other (e.g., Indo-European) languages, down-to-the-root decomposition in Hebrew does not apply to stems of non-productive verbal classes. We conclude that the Semitic word processor is less unique than previously thought: Although it operates on morphological units that are combined in a non-linear way, it engages the same universal mechanisms of storage and computation as those seen in other languages.

Citing Articles

The Role of Morphological Information in Processing Pseudo-words in Italian L2 Learners: It's a Matter of Experience.

Amenta S, Foppolo F, Badan L J Cogn. 2025; 8(1):14.

PMID: 39803176 PMC: 11720858. DOI: 10.5334/joc.420.


The Role of the Root in Spoken Word Recognition in Hebrew: An Auditory Gating Paradigm.

Oganyan M, Wright R Brain Sci. 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35741635 PMC: 9221200. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12060750.


Morphological Decomposition in L2 Arabic: A Masked Priming Study.

Foote R, Qasem M, Trentman E J Psycholinguist Res. 2020; 49(2):291-317.

PMID: 32008140 DOI: 10.1007/s10936-020-09688-6.


The Form of Morphemes: MEG Evidence From Masked Priming of Two Hebrew Templates.

Kastner I, Pylkkanen L, Marantz A Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2163.

PMID: 30483184 PMC: 6240614. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02163.

References
1.
Velan H, Frost R . Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: the impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007; 14(5):913-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194121. View

2.
Forster K, Forster J . DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003; 35(1):116-24. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195503. View

3.
Verissimo J, Clahsen H . Morphological priming by itself: a study of Portuguese conjugations. Cognition. 2009; 112(1):187-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.003. View

4.
Marslen-Wilson W, Tyler L . Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011; 2(11):428-35. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01239-x. View

5.
Deutsch A, Frost R, Forster K . Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998; 24(5):1238-55. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1238. View