» Articles » PMID: 28334383

A Critical Role of Inhibition in Temporal Processing Maturation in the Primary Auditory Cortex

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Mar 24
PMID 28334383
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Faithful representation of sound envelopes in primary auditory cortex (A1) is vital for temporal processing and perception of natural sounds. However, the emergence of cortical temporal processing mechanisms during development remains poorly understood. Although cortical inhibition has been proposed to play an important role in this process, direct in-vivo evidence has been lacking. Using loose-patch recordings in rat A1 immediately after hearing onset, we found that stimulus-following ability in fast-spiking neurons was significantly better than in regular-spiking (RS) neurons. In-vivo whole-cell recordings of RS neurons revealed that inhibition in the developing A1 demonstrated much weaker adaptation to repetitive stimuli than in adult A1. Furthermore, inhibitory synaptic inputs were of longer duration than observed in vitro and in adults. Early in development, overlap of the prolonged inhibition evoked by 2 closely following stimuli disrupted the classical temporal sequence between excitation and inhibition, resulting in slower following capacity. During maturation, inhibitory duration gradually shortened accompanied by an improving temporal following ability of RS neurons. Both inhibitory duration and stimulus-following ability demonstrated exposure-based plasticity. These results demonstrate the role of inhibition in setting the pace for experience-dependent maturation of temporal processing in the auditory cortex.

Citing Articles

Sex differences during development in cortical temporal processing and event related potentials in wild-type and fragile X syndrome model mice.

Croom K, Rumschlag J, Erickson M, Binder D, Razak K J Neurodev Disord. 2024; 16(1):24.

PMID: 38720271 PMC: 11077726. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-024-09539-8.


Whole-Brain Direct Inputs to and Axonal Projections from Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in the Mouse Primary Auditory Area.

Zhao M, Ren M, Jiang T, Jia X, Wang X, Li A Neurosci Bull. 2022; 38(6):576-590.

PMID: 35312957 PMC: 9206059. DOI: 10.1007/s12264-022-00838-5.


Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss Disrupts the Developmental Refinement of Binaural Processing in the Rat Primary Auditory Cortex.

Liu J, Huang X, Zhang J Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:762337.

PMID: 34867170 PMC: 8640238. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.762337.


Plasticity of Multidimensional Receptive Fields in Core Rat Auditory Cortex Directed by Sound Statistics.

Homma N, Atencio C, Schreiner C Neuroscience. 2021; 467:150-170.

PMID: 33951506 PMC: 9017652. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.04.028.


The ins and outs of inhibitory synaptic plasticity: Neuron types, molecular mechanisms and functional roles.

Capogna M, Castillo P, Maffei A Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 54(8):6882-6901.

PMID: 32663353 PMC: 9150441. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14907.


References
1.
Xu J, Yu L, Cai R, Zhang J, Sun X . Early continuous white noise exposure alters auditory spatial sensitivity and expression of GAD65 and GABAA receptor subunits in rat auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 20(4):804-12. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp143. View

2.
Laurie D, Seeburg P, Wisden W . The distribution of 13 GABAA receptor subunit mRNAs in the rat brain. II. Olfactory bulb and cerebellum. J Neurosci. 1992; 12(3):1063-76. PMC: 6576040. View

3.
Barbour D, Callaway E . Excitatory local connections of superficial neurons in rat auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(44):11174-85. PMC: 2610470. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2093-08.2008. View

4.
Sun Q . The missing piece in the 'use it or lose it' puzzle: is inhibition regulated by activity or does it act on its own accord?. Rev Neurosci. 2007; 18(3-4):295-310. PMC: 2408386. DOI: 10.1515/revneuro.2007.18.3-4.295. View

5.
Khavarghazalani B, Farahani F, Emadi M, Hosseni Dastgerdi Z . Auditory processing abilities in children with chronic otitis media with effusion. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016; 136(5):456-9. DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1129552. View