» Articles » PMID: 28331859

A Copmarative Review of Electronic Prescription Systems: Lessons Learned from Developed Countries

Overview
Date 2017 Mar 24
PMID 28331859
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This review study aimed to compare the electronic prescription systems in five selected countries (Denmark, Finland, Sweden, England, and the United States). Compared developed countries were selected by the identified selection process from the countries that have electronic prescription systems. Required data were collected by searching the valid databases, most widely used search engines, and visiting websites related to the national electronic prescription system of each country and also sending E-mails to the related organizations using specifically designed data collection forms. The findings showed that the electronic prescription system was used at the national, state, local, and area levels in the studied countries and covered the whole prescription process or part of it. There were capabilities of creating electronic prescription, decision support, electronically transmitting prescriptions from prescriber systems to the pharmacies, retrieving the electronic prescription at the pharmacy, electronic refilling prescriptions in all studied countries. The patient, prescriber, and dispenser were main human actors, as well as the prescribing and dispensing providers were main system actors of the Electronic Prescription Service. The selected countries have accurate, regular, and systematic plans to use electronic prescription system, and health ministry of these countries was responsible for coordinating and leading the electronic health. It is suggested to use experiences and programs of the leading countries to design and develop the electronic prescription systems.

Citing Articles

Challenges and solutions in implementing electronic prescribing in Iran's health system: a qualitative study.

Moghani N, Hooshmand E, Zarqi M, Meraji M BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):393.

PMID: 39696243 PMC: 11657228. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02737-3.


Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) of the electronic prescribing systems executed in Iran from the physician's viewpoint: a qualitative study.

Jebraeily M, Naji S, Nourani A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):279.

PMID: 39350196 PMC: 11441130. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02687-w.


Challenges and advantages of electronic prescribing system: a survey study and thematic analysis.

Bouraghi H, Imani B, Saeedi A, Mohammadpour A, Saeedi S, Khodaveisi T BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):689.

PMID: 38816874 PMC: 11141034. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11144-3.


Physicians' Perspectives with the E-prescribing System in Five Teaching Hospitals.

Alipour J, Payandeh A, Hashemi A, Aliabadi A, Karimi A Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(3):428-436.

PMID: 38810656 PMC: 11136528. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786872.


Electronic prescription systems in Greece: a large-scale survey of healthcare professionals' perceptions.

Grammatikopoulou M, Lazarou I, Giannios G, Kakalou C, Zachariadou M, Zande M Arch Public Health. 2024; 82(1):68.

PMID: 38730501 PMC: 11088065. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01304-6.


References
1.
Taylor J, Loan L, Kamara J, Blackburn S, Whitney D . Medication administration variances before and after implementation of computerized physician order entry in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(1):123-8. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-0919. View

2.
Ekedahl A . Problem prescriptions in Sweden necessitating contact with the prescriber before dispensing. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010; 6(3):174-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.09.001. View

3.
Wang C, Patel M, Schueth A, Bradley M, Wu S, Crosson J . Perceptions of standards-based electronic prescribing systems as implemented in outpatient primary care: a physician survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009; 16(4):493-502. PMC: 2705252. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2998. View

4.
Gider O, Ocak S, Top M . Evaluation of electronic prescription implications in Turkey: an investigation of the perceptions of physicians. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015; 12(2):88-97. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12082. View

5.
Oliven A, Michalake I, Zalman D, Dorman E, Yeshurun D, Odeh M . Prevention of prescription errors by computerized, on-line surveillance of drug order entry. Int J Med Inform. 2005; 74(5):377-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.010. View