» Articles » PMID: 28330194

Exploited Application of Sulfate-reducing Bacteria for Concomitant Treatment of Metallic and Non-metallic Wastes: a Mini Review

Overview
Journal 3 Biotech
Publisher Springer
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2017 Mar 24
PMID 28330194
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A variety of multidimensional anthropogenic activities, especially of industrial level, are contaminating our aquatic and terrestrial environments with a variety of metallic and non-metallic pollutants. The metallic and non-metallic pollutants addressed specifically in this review are heavy metals and various compound forms of sulfates, respectively. Direct and indirect deleterious effects of the both types of pollutants to all forms of life are well-known. The treatment of such pollutants is therefore much necessary before their final discharge into the environment. This review summarizes the productive utility of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) for economical and concomitant treatment of the above mentioned wastes. Utilization of agro-industrial wastes and some environmental contaminants including hydrocarbons, as economical growth substrates for SRB, is also suggested and proved efficient in this review. Mechanistically, SRB will utilize sulfates as their terminal electron acceptors during respiration while utilizing agro-industrial and/or hydrocarbon wastes as electron donors/carbon sources and generate HS. The biogenic HS will then react vigorously with dissolved metals present in the wastewaters thus forming metal sulfide. The metal sulfide being water insoluble and heavier than water will settle down in the water as precipitates. In this way, three types of pollutants i.e., metals, sulfates and agro-industrial and/or hydrocarbon wastes will be treated simultaneously.

Citing Articles

Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in oil reservoir and biological control of SRB: a review.

Gao P, Fan K Arch Microbiol. 2023; 205(5):162.

PMID: 37010699 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-023-03520-0.


Molecular regulation of conditioning film formation and quorum quenching in sulfate reducing bacteria.

Raya D, Shreya A, Kumar A, Giri S, Salem D, Gnimpieba E Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:1008536.

PMID: 36386676 PMC: 9659907. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1008536.


Comparison of different small molecular weight alcohols for sustaining sulfidogenic bioreactors maintained at moderately low pH.

Santos A, Johnson D Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:937987.

PMID: 36032724 PMC: 9402942. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.937987.


The role of organic acid metabolites in geo-energy pipeline corrosion in a sulfate reducing bacteria environment.

Madirisha M, Hack R, van der Meer F Heliyon. 2022; 8(5):e09420.

PMID: 35647338 PMC: 9136253. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09420.


Transcriptomics and Functional Analysis of Copper Stress Response in the Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium G20.

Tripathi A, Saxena P, Thakur P, Rauniyar S, Samanta D, Gopalakrishnan V Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(3).

PMID: 35163324 PMC: 8836040. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031396.


References
1.
Harms G, Zengler K, Rabus R, Aeckersberg F, Minz D, Rossello-Mora R . Anaerobic oxidation of o-xylene, m-xylene, and homologous alkylbenzenes by new types of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999; 65(3):999-1004. PMC: 91135. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.3.999-1004.1999. View

2.
Gadd G . Bioremedial potential of microbial mechanisms of metal mobilization and immobilization. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2000; 11(3):271-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0958-1669(00)00095-1. View

3.
Duong T, Suruda A, Maier L . Interstitial fibrosis following hydrogen sulfide exposure. Am J Ind Med. 2001; 40(2):221-4. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.1091. View

4.
Annachhatre A, Suktrakoolvait S . Biological sulfate reduction using molasses as a carbon source. Water Environ Res. 2001; 73(1):118-26. DOI: 10.2175/106143001x138778. View

5.
Lens P, Kuenen J . The biological sulfur cycle: novel opportunities for environmental biotechnology. Water Sci Technol. 2001; 44(8):57-66. View