» Articles » PMID: 28327953

Final Overall Survival Analysis for the Phase II RECORD-3 Study of First-line Everolimus Followed by Sunitinib Versus First-line Sunitinib Followed by Everolimus in Metastatic RCC

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Mar 23
PMID 28327953
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: RECORD-3 compared everolimus and sunitinib as first-line therapy, and the sequence of everolimus followed by sunitinib at progression compared with the opposite (standard) sequence in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This final overall survival (OS) analysis evaluated mature data for secondary end points.

Patients And Methods: Patients received either first-line everolimus followed by second-line sunitinib at progression (n = 238) or first-line sunitinib followed by second-line everolimus (n = 233). Secondary end points were combined first- and second-line progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety. The impacts of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and baseline levels of soluble biomarkers on OS were explored.

Results: At final analysis, median duration of exposure was 5.6 months for everolimus and 8.3 months for sunitinib. Median combined PFS was 21.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1-26.7] with everolimus-sunitinib and 22.2 months (95% CI 16.0-29.8) with sunitinib-everolimus [hazard ratio (HR)EVE-SUN/SUN-EVE, 1.2; 95% CI 0.9-1.6]. Median OS was 22.4 months (95% CI 18.6-33.3) for everolimus-sunitinib and 29.5 months (95% CI 22.8-33.1) for sunitinib-everolimus (HREVE-SUN/SUN-EVE, 1.1; 95% CI 0.9-1.4). The rates of grade 3 and 4 adverse events suspected to be related to second-line therapy were 47% with everolimus and 57% with sunitinib. Higher NLR and 12 soluble biomarker levels were identified as prognostic markers for poor OS with the association being largely independent of treatment sequences.

Conclusions: Results of this final OS analysis support the sequence of sunitinib followed by everolimus at progression in patients with mRCC. The safety profiles of everolimus and sunitinib were consistent with those previously reported, and there were no unexpected safety signals.

Clinical Trials Number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00903175.

Citing Articles

ACE Loss Drives Renal Cell Carcinoma Growth and Invasion by Modulating AKT-FOXO1.

Yin L, Mao L, Yin R, Lv C, Shi X, Yue C Biologics. 2024; 18:397-412.

PMID: 39717370 PMC: 11665188. DOI: 10.2147/BTT.S485178.


Construction methods and latest applications of kidney cancer organoids.

Li Z, You Y, Feng B, Chen J, Gao H, Li F Oncol Rev. 2024; 18:1434981.

PMID: 39600908 PMC: 11588466. DOI: 10.3389/or.2024.1434981.


PDZK1 confers sensitivity to sunitinib in clear cell renal cell carcinoma by suppressing the PDGFR-β pathway.

Wang H, Zhang L, Liu H, Yang Y, Lu W, Cao X Br J Cancer. 2024; 131(2):347-360.

PMID: 38822145 PMC: 11263541. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02725-4.


Advanced renal cell carcinoma management: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) consensus update.

Soares A, Marques Monteiro F, da Trindade K, Silva A, Cardoso A, Sasse A J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024; 150(4):183.

PMID: 38594593 PMC: 11003910. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05663-z.


A single-arm phase II clinical trial of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Huang J, Xie X, Chen X, Zhang Q, Chen L, Bai X Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1122294.

PMID: 37124484 PMC: 10130368. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1122294.


References
1.
Templeton A, Knox J, Lin X, Simantov R, Xie W, Lawrence N . Change in Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio in Response to Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma as a Prognosticator and Biomarker of Efficacy. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(2):358-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.033. View

2.
Choueiri T, Escudier B, Powles T, Mainwaring P, Rini B, Donskov F . Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(19):1814-23. PMC: 5024539. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510016. View

3.
Motzer R, Alyasova A, Ye D, Karpenko A, Li H, Alekseev B . Phase II trial of second-line everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RECORD-4). Ann Oncol. 2015; 27(3):441-8. PMC: 5006123. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv612. View

4.
Motzer R, Escudier B, Oudard S, Hutson T, Porta C, Bracarda S . Phase 3 trial of everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma : final results and analysis of prognostic factors. Cancer. 2010; 116(18):4256-65. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25219. View

5.
Motzer R, Escudier B, Tomczak P, Hutson T, Michaelson M, Negrier S . Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(6):552-62. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70093-7. View