Acoustic Startle Modification As a Tool for Evaluating Auditory Function of the Mouse: Progress, Pitfalls, and Potential

Overview

Journal Neurosci Biobehav Rev

Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Social Sciences

Date 2017 Mar 23

PMID 28327385

Citations 30

Authors

Amanda M Lauer

Derik Behrens

Georg Klump

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Acoustic startle response (ASR) modification procedures, especially prepulse inhibition (PPI), are increasingly used as behavioral measures of auditory processing and sensorimotor gating in rodents due to their perceived ease of implementation and short testing times. In practice, ASR and PPI procedures are extremely variable across animals, experimental setups, and studies, and the interpretation of results is subject to numerous caveats and confounding influences. We review considerations for modification of the ASR using acoustic stimuli, and we compare the sensitivity of PPI procedures to more traditional operant psychoacoustic techniques. We also discuss non-auditory variables that must be considered. We conclude that ASR and PPI measures cannot substitute for traditional operant techniques due to their low sensitivity. Additionally, a substantial amount of pilot testing must be performed to properly optimize an ASR modification experiment, negating any time benefit over operant conditioning. Nevertheless, there are some circumstances where ASR measures may be the only option for assessing auditory behavior, such as when testing mouse strains with early-onset hearing loss or learning impairments.

Citing Articles

Sound-seeking before and after hearing loss in mice.

Mai J, Gargiullo R, Zheng M, Esho V, Hussein O, Pollay E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19181.

PMID: 39160202 PMC: 11333604. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67577-7.

Alpha9alpha10 knockout mice show altered physiological and behavioral responses to signals in masking noise.

Mondul J, Burke K, Morley B, Lauer A J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(5):3183-3194.

PMID: 38738939 PMC: 11093617. DOI: 10.1121/10.0025985.

Sound elicits stereotyped facial movements that provide a sensitive index of hearing abilities in mice.

Clayton K, Stecyk K, Guo A, Chambers A, Chen K, Hancock K Curr Biol. 2024; 34(8):1605-1620.e5.

PMID: 38492568 PMC: 11043000. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.02.057.

Sound-seeking before and after hearing loss in mice.

Mai J, Gargiullo R, Zheng M, Esho V, Hussein O, Pollay E bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38260458 PMC: 10802496. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.08.574475.

The +/+) mouse model of autism spectrum disorder displays auditory avoidance in a novel behavioral test.

Goncalves A, Sousa N, Jacinto L, Monteiro P Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1205507.

PMID: 37693284 PMC: 10483143. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1205507.

References

Gomez-Nieto R, Horta-Junior J, Castellano O, Millian-Morell L, Rubio M, Lopez D . Origin and function of short-latency inputs to the neural substrates underlying the acoustic startle reflex. Front Neurosci. 2014; 8:216. PMC: 4110630. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00216. View

Kallnik M, Elvert R, Ehrhardt N, Kissling D, Mahabir E, Welzl G . Impact of IVC housing on emotionality and fear learning in male C3HeB/FeJ and C57BL/6J mice. Mamm Genome. 2007; 18(3):173-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00335-007-9002-z. View

Koch M, Lingenhohl K, Pilz P . Loss of the acoustic startle response following neurotoxic lesions of the caudal pontine reticular formation: possible role of giant neurons. Neuroscience. 1992; 49(3):617-25. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90231-p. View

Hormigo S, Gomez-Nieto R, Castellano O, Herrero-Turrion M, Lopez D, Horta-Junior J . The noradrenergic projection from the locus coeruleus to the cochlear root neurons in rats. Brain Struct Funct. 2014; 220(3):1477-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-014-0739-3. View

Young J, Fechter L . Reflex inhibition procedures for animal audiometry: a technique for assessing ototoxicity. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983; 73(5):1686-93. DOI: 10.1121/1.389391. View

Lauer A, May B, Hao Z, Watson J . Analysis of environmental sound levels in modern rodent housing rooms. Lab Anim (NY). 2009; 38(5):154-60. PMC: 2742378. DOI: 10.1038/laban0509-154. View

Dirks A, De Jongh R, Groenink L, van der Gugten J, Hijzen T, Olivier B . Footshock-induced sensitization of the acoustic startle response in two strains of mice. Behav Brain Res. 2001; 123(1):17-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00193-0. View

Hoffman H, STITT C . Inhibition of the glabella reflex by monaural and binaural stimulation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1980; 6(4):769-76. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.6.4.769. View

Wu M, Suzuki S, Siegel J . Anatomical distribution and response patterns of reticular neurons active in relation to acoustic startle. Brain Res. 1988; 457(2):399-406. PMC: 9044405. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90716-0. View

10.

Galazyuk A, Hebert S . Gap-Prepulse Inhibition of the Acoustic Startle Reflex (GPIAS) for Tinnitus Assessment: Current Status and Future Directions. Front Neurol. 2015; 6:88. PMC: 4411996. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00088. View

11.

Carlson S, Willott J . Caudal pontine reticular formation of C57BL/6J mice: responses to startle stimuli, inhibition by tones, and plasticity. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79(5):2603-14. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.5.2603. View

12.

Simons-Weidenmaier N, Weber M, Plappert C, Pilz P, Schmid S . Synaptic depression and short-term habituation are located in the sensory part of the mammalian startle pathway. BMC Neurosci. 2006; 7:38. PMC: 1479352. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-38. View

13.

Brown M, Berglund A, Kiang N, Ryugo D . Central trajectories of type II spiral ganglion neurons. J Comp Neurol. 1988; 278(4):581-90. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902780409. View

14.

Salloum R, Yurosko C, Santiago L, Sandridge S, Kaltenbach J . Induction of enhanced acoustic startle response by noise exposure: dependence on exposure conditions and testing parameters and possible relevance to hyperacusis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e111747. PMC: 4216136. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111747. View

15.

Swerdlow N, Braff D, Geyer M . Sensorimotor gating of the startle reflex: what we said 25 years ago, what has happened since then, and what comes next. J Psychopharmacol. 2016; 30(11):1072-1081. PMC: 6036900. DOI: 10.1177/0269881116661075. View

16.

Swerdlow N, Geyer M, Hartman P, Sprock J, Auerbach P, Cadenhead K . Sex differences in sensorimotor gating of the human startle reflex: all smoke?. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999; 146(2):228-32. DOI: 10.1007/s002130051111. View

17.

Ison J, Agrawal P, Pak J, Vaughn W . Changes in temporal acuity with age and with hearing impairment in the mouse: a study of the acoustic startle reflex and its inhibition by brief decrements in noise level. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 104(3 Pt 1):1696-704. DOI: 10.1121/1.424382. View

18.

Chabot C, Taylor D . Circadian modulation of the rat acoustic startle response. Behav Neurosci. 1992; 106(5):846-52. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.106.5.846. View

19.

Leitner D, Cohen M . Role of the inferior colliculus in the inhibition of acoustic startle in the rat. Physiol Behav. 1985; 34(1):65-70. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90079-4. View

20.

Allen P, Ison J . Sensitivity of the mouse to changes in azimuthal sound location: angular separation, spectral composition, and sound level. Behav Neurosci. 2010; 124(2):265-77. PMC: 2856490. DOI: 10.1037/a0018913. View