» Articles » PMID: 28322414

Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Mortality and Ventilator-Free Days in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation With Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 22
PMID 28322414
Citations 95
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Dexmedetomidine provides sedation for patients undergoing ventilation; however, its effects on mortality and ventilator-free days have not been well studied among patients with sepsis.

Objectives: To examine whether a sedation strategy with dexmedetomidine can improve clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis undergoing ventilation.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted at 8 intensive care units in Japan from February 2013 until January 2016 among 201 consecutive adult patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either sedation with dexmedetomidine (n = 100) or sedation without dexmedetomidine (control group; n = 101). Other agents used in both groups were fentanyl, propofol, and midazolam.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The co-primary outcomes were mortality and ventilator-free days (over a 28-day duration). Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8), sedation control, occurrence of delirium and coma, intensive care unit stay duration, renal function, inflammation, and nutrition state were assessed as secondary outcomes.

Results: Of the 203 screened patients, 201 were randomized. The mean age was 69 years (SD, 14 years); 63% were male. Mortality at 28 days was not significantly different in the dexmedetomidine group vs the control group (19 patients [22.8%] vs 28 patients [30.8%]; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.38-1.22; P = .20). Ventilator-free days over 28 days were not significantly different between groups (dexmedetomidine group: median, 20 [interquartile range, 5-24] days; control group: median, 18 [interquartile range, 0.5-23] days; P = .20). The dexmedetomidine group had a significantly higher rate of well-controlled sedation during mechanical ventilation (range, 17%-58% vs 20%-39%; P = .01); other outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Adverse events occurred in 8 (8%) and 3 (3%) patients in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively.

Conclusions And Relevance: Among patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the use of dexmedetomidine compared with no dexmedetomidine did not result in statistically significant improvement in mortality or ventilator-free days. However, the study may have been underpowered for mortality, and additional research may be needed to evaluate this further.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01760967.

Citing Articles

Dexmedetomidine improves clinical outcomes in sepsis-induced myocardial injury: a retrospective cohort study.

Liu Y, Ouyang J, Zhang C, Niu P, Shang B, Yao G Front Pharmacol. 2025; 15:1529167.

PMID: 39881865 PMC: 11774859. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1529167.


Composite Primary Outcomes Reported in Studies of Critical Care: A Scoping Review.

Marella P, De Silva S, Attokaran A, Laupland K, Eriksson L, Ramanan M Crit Care Explor. 2025; 7(1):e1195.

PMID: 39836182 PMC: 11749510. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001195.


A Retrospective, Single-Center Assessment of Changes in Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Management Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Winner R, Ware L, Dube K, Kovacevic M, Lupi K, Szumita P Crit Care Explor. 2025; 7(1):e1202.

PMID: 39813020 PMC: 11737495. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001202.


INhaled Sedation versus Propofol in REspiratory failure in the Intensive Care Unit (INSPiRE-ICU1): protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.

Boncyk C, Devlin J, Faisal H, Girard T, Hsu S, Jabaley C BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e086946.

PMID: 39461861 PMC: 11529737. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086946.


The relationship between dexmedetomidine administration and prognosis in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a retrospective cohort study.

Huang H, Li Q, Lin Q, Gong Z, Chen L, Chen F Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1414809.

PMID: 39108742 PMC: 11300284. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1414809.


References
1.
Girard T, Kress J, Fuchs B, Thomason J, Schweickert W, Pun B . Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 371(9607):126-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60105-1. View

2.
Jakob S, Ruokonen E, Grounds R, Sarapohja T, Garratt C, Pocock S . Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2012; 307(11):1151-60. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.304. View

3.
Vasilevskis E, Wesley Ely E, Speroff T, Pun B, Boehm L, Dittus R . Reducing iatrogenic risks: ICU-acquired delirium and weakness--crossing the quality chasm. Chest. 2010; 138(5):1224-33. PMC: 4694109. DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-0466. View

4.
Barr J, Fraser G, Puntillo K, Wesley Ely E, Gelinas C, Dasta J . Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2012; 41(1):263-306. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72. View

5.
Taniguchi T, Kurita A, Kobayashi K, Yamamoto K, Inaba H . Dose- and time-related effects of dexmedetomidine on mortality and inflammatory responses to endotoxin-induced shock in rats. J Anesth. 2008; 22(3):221-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-008-0611-9. View