» Articles » PMID: 28319122

Can a Simulation-based Training Program Impact the Use of Evidence Based Routine Practices at Birth? Results of a Hospital-based Cluster Randomized Trial in Mexico

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Mar 21
PMID 28319122
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In Mexico, although the majority of births are attended in hospitals, reports have emerged of obstetric violence, use of unsafe practices, and failure to employ evidence-based practices (EBP). Recent attention has refocused global efforts towards provision of quality care that is both patient-centered and evidence-based. Scaling up of local interventions should rely on strong evidence of effectiveness.

Objective: To perform a secondary analysis to evaluate the impact of a simulation and team-training program (PRONTO) on the performance of EBP in normal births.

Methods: A pair-matched cluster randomized controlled trial of the intervention was designed to measure the impact of the program (PRONTO intervention) on a sample of 24 hospitals (12 hospitals received the PRONTO training and 12 served as controls) in the states of Chiapas, Guerrero, and Mexico. We estimated the impact of receiving the intervention on the probability of birth practices performance in a sample of 641 observed births of which 318 occurred in the treated hospitals and 323 occurred in control hospitals. Data was collected at 4 time points (baseline, 4th, 8th and 12th months after the training). Women were blinded to treatment allocation but observers and providers were not. Estimates were obtained by fitting difference-in-differences logistic regression models considering confounding variables. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: # NCT01477554.

Results: Significant changes were found following the intervention. At 4 months post-intervention an increase of 20 percentage points (p.p.) for complete Active Management of Third Stage of Labor (AMTSL) (p = 0.044), and 16 p.p. increase for Skin-to-Skin Contact (p = 0.067); at 12 months a 25 p.p. increase of the 1st step of AMTSL (p = 0.026) and a 42 p.p. increase of Delayed Cord Clamping (p = 0.004); at 4 months a 30 (p = 0.001) and at 8 months a 22 (p = 0.010) p.p. decrease for Uterine Sweeping.

Conclusions: The intervention has an impact on adopting EBP at birth, contributing to an increased quality of care. Long lasting impacts on these practices are possible if there were to be a widespread adoption of the training techniques including simulation, team-training and facilitated discussions regarding routine care.

Citing Articles

The impact of implementing and sustaining the international guidelines for skin-to-skin contact in the first hour after birth in Uganda.

Brimdyr K, Mbalinda S, Blair A, Svensson K, Kagawa M, Reyes M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):32042.

PMID: 39738745 PMC: 11685598. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83761-1.


Checklist: A Useful and Safe Tool for the Initiation of Care for Eutocical Vaginal Delivery.

Fernandez Munoz M, Reyes Angullo Z, Recarte P, Consuelo Soto L, Labarta J, Cueto Hernandez I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(20).

PMID: 36293987 PMC: 9603150. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013409.


Improving the Quality of Maternity Care through the Introduction of Professional Midwives and Mentoring in Selected Sub-District Hospitals in Bangladesh: A Mixed Method Study Protocol.

Anderson R, Zaman S Methods Protoc. 2022; 5(5).

PMID: 36287056 PMC: 9610590. DOI: 10.3390/mps5050084.


Super Divya to the rescue! Exploring Nurse Mentor Supervisor perceptions on a digital tool to support learning and engagement for simulation educators in Bihar, India.

Kalra A, Siju M, Jenny A, Spindler H, Madriz S, Baayd J BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):206.

PMID: 35346172 PMC: 8959557. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03270-5.


Health care workers' perceptions of episiotomy in the era of respectful maternity care: a qualitative study of an obstetric training program in Mexico.

Garcia-Cerde R, Torres-Pereda P, Olvera-Garcia M, Hulme J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):549.

PMID: 34384395 PMC: 8359587. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04022-x.


References
1.
Kassebaum N, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall M, Shackelford K, Steiner C, Heuton K . Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014; 384(9947):980-1004. PMC: 4255481. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60696-6. View

2.
Fauveau V, de Bernis L . "Good obstetrics" revisited: too many evidence-based practices and devices are not used. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006; 94(2):179-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.05.020. View

3.
Walker D, DeMaria L, Suarez L, Cragin L . Skilled birth attendants in Mexico: how does care during normal birth by general physicians, obstetric nurses, and professional midwives compare with World Health Organization evidence-based practice guidelines?. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012; 57(1):18-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00075.x. View

4.
Renfrew M, McFadden A, Bastos M, Campbell J, Channon A, Cheung N . Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014; 384(9948):1129-45. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3. View

5.
Menget A, Mougey C, Thiriez G, Riethmuller D . [Advantage of delayed umbilical cord clamping in the newborn infant]. Arch Pediatr. 2013; 20(9):1022-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.06.016. View