» Articles » PMID: 28316961

Acute Delayed or Late Infection of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Treated with Debridement/Antibiotic-loaded Cement Beads and Retention of the Prosthesis

Overview
Journal Hip Pelvis
Date 2017 Mar 21
PMID 28316961
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The treatment of infected revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is very challenging due to retained revision prosthesis, poor bone stock and soft tissue condition derived from previous revision surgeries, and comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and short-term outcomes of aggressive debridement and use of antibiotic-loaded cement beads with retention of the prosthesis for acute delayed or late infection of revision THAs.

Materials And Methods: Ten consecutive patients with symptoms or signs of less than one-week evolution and well-fixed prostheses, were treated with this procedure and a postoperative course of organism-specific antibiotics for a minimum of 6 weeks. All hips presented with acute delayed or late infection of revision THAs. Patients with a mean age of 68.1 years (range, 59-78 years) underwent an average of 1.9 previous revision THAs (1-4) before the index surgery. The minimal follow-up was 2 years with a mean of 46.2 months (range, 24-64 months).

Results: There were 8 cures (80.0%) and 2 failures with no mortality during the study period. The 2 failures involved the same and resistant bacteria implicated in the primary infection (methicillin-resistant and , respectively). The mean Harris hip score was 65.2 (range, 26-83) and the mean visual analogue scale was 2.6 (range, 1-4) at final follow-up.

Conclusion: With a favorable success rate and no mortality, our procedure may be considered a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of acute delayed or late infection of revision THAs with well-fixed prostheses.

Citing Articles

Promising applications of D-amino acids in periprosthetic joint infection.

Caldwell M, Hughes M, Wei F, Ngo C, Pascua R, Pugazhendhi A Bone Res. 2023; 11(1):14.

PMID: 36894568 PMC: 9998894. DOI: 10.1038/s41413-023-00254-z.

References
1.
Estes C, Beauchamp C, Clarke H, Spangehl M . A two-stage retention débridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(8):2029-38. PMC: 2895840. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1293-9. View

2.
Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M . Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(7):1487-97. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02441. View

3.
Cataldo M, Petrosillo N, Cipriani M, Cauda R, Tacconelli E . Prosthetic joint infection: recent developments in diagnosis and management. J Infect. 2010; 61(6):443-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.09.033. View

4.
Oussedik S, Dodd M, Haddad F . Outcomes of revision total hip replacement for infection after grading according to a standard protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(9):1222-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.23663. View

5.
Kalra K, Lin K, Bozic K, Ries M . Repeat 2-stage revision for recurrent infection of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(6):880-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.12.010. View