» Articles » PMID: 28316366

A Commentary on Age Segregation for Older Prisoners: Philosophical and Pragmatic Considerations for Correctional Systems

Overview
Date 2017 Mar 21
PMID 28316366
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The growing number of older prisoners in state and federal prisons has fostered an important discussion in literature regarding the potential benefits of age-segregated living arrangements for older inmates. This article begins with a brief review of the reasons for America's aging prison population. Thereafter, it uses a multidisciplinary literature review to clarify a 4-point rationale for age-segregated prisons: (a) cost savings via centralized health care for older prisoners; (b) the reduction of civil liabilities for correctional systems that centralize disability services as per requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; (c) the advancement of prisoner safety for older inmates; and (d) the promotion of rehabilitation by advancing treatment opportunities with a group that is most likely to desist from future criminal activity (in part) due to age-related desistance from crime. Conclusions focus on age segregation within the historical context of segregation in prison based on sociodemographic characteristics.

Citing Articles

Cognitive Impairment in Older Incarcerated Males: Education and Race Considerations.

Perez A, Manning K, Powell W, Barry L Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021; 29(10):1062-1073.

PMID: 34193384 PMC: 8448974. DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.05.014.


Self-rated health and mental health among older incarcerated males.

Vogel C, Molinari V, Andel R, Barry L Aging Ment Health. 2020; 25(11):2100-2108.

PMID: 32698603 PMC: 7855989. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1795621.


Functional disability, depression, and suicidal ideation in older prisoners.

Barry L, Coman E, Wakefield D, Trestman R, Conwell Y, Steffens D J Affect Disord. 2020; 266:366-373.

PMID: 32056900 PMC: 7103559. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.156.


Health-care needs of older women prisoners: Perspectives of the health-care workers who care for them.

Barry L, Adams K, Zaugg D, Noujaim D J Women Aging. 2019; 32(2):183-202.

PMID: 30943874 PMC: 6776728. DOI: 10.1080/08952841.2019.1593771.


The determinants of individual health care expenditures in prison: evidence from Switzerland.

Moschetti K, Zabrodina V, Wangmo T, Holly A, Wasserfallen J, Elger B BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):160.

PMID: 29514629 PMC: 5842659. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2962-8.


References
1.
Gilligan J, Lee B . Beyond the prison paradigm: from provoking violence to preventing it by creating "anti-prisons" (residential colleges and therapeutic communities). Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005; 1036:300-24. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1330.030. View

2.
Cunningham M, Reidy T, Sorensen J . Assertions of "future dangerousness" at federal capital sentencing: rates and correlates of subsequent prison misconduct and violence. Law Hum Behav. 2007; 32(1):46-63. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-007-9107-7. View

3.
Wolff N, Blitz C, Shi J, Bachman R, Siegel J . Sexual violence inside prisons: rates of victimization. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(5):835-48. PMC: 2438589. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9065-2. View

4.
Styve G, Mackenzie D, Gover A, Mitchell O . Perceived conditions of confinement: a national evaluation of juvenile boot camps and traditional facilities. Law Hum Behav. 2000; 24(3):297-308. DOI: 10.1023/a:1005532004014. View

5.
Loeb S, AbuDagga A . Health-related research on older inmates: an integrative review. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29(6):556-65. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20177. View