» Articles » PMID: 28313130

Gut Architecture, Digestive Constraints and Feeding Ecology of Deposit-feeding and Carnivorous Polychaetes

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2017 Mar 18
PMID 28313130
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We analyze gut architectures of 42 species of marine polychaetes in terms of their anatomically distinct compartments, and quantify differences among guts in terms of ratios of body volume to gut volume, relative compartmental volumes, total gut aspect ratios and compartmental aspect ratios. We use multivariate techniques to classify these polychaetes into 4 groups: carnivores with tubular guts; deposit feeders with tubular guts; deposit feeders with 3 gut compartments; and deposit feeders with 4 or 5 gut compartments. Tubular guts, morphological expressions of plug flow, are common among deposit feeders and may allow relatively rapid ingestion rates and short throughput times. Median gut volume per unit of body volume in deposit feeders (31%) is twice that of carnivores (15%) and ranges up to 83% in one deep-sea species. Deep-sea deposit feeders tend to have relatively larger and longer guts than closely-related nearshore and shelf species. Guts of a number of deep-sea deposit feeders and nearshore and shelf deposit feeders from muddy environments are relatively longer and narrower as body size increases, suggesting that digestive diffusion limitations may be important. Gut volume scales as (body volume) while ingestion rate scales as (body volume). If diet and the chemical kinetics of digestion do not change appreciably, throughput time and thus the extent of digestion of given dietary components therefore must increase as a deposit feeder grows. Digestive processing constrainst may be most important in juveniles of species (especially those species with plug-flow guts) that are deposit feeders as adults.

Citing Articles

Using external morphology as a proxy for stomach size in .

Fletcher L, Blakeslee A, Crane L, Repetto M, Toscano B, Griffen B Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(5):e11344.

PMID: 38698925 PMC: 11063776. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11344.


Fundamentals of burrowing in soft animals and robots.

Dorgan K, Daltorio K Front Robot AI. 2023; 10:1057876.

PMID: 36793873 PMC: 9923007. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1057876.


Long forgotten: Baird, 1869 (Annelida, Eunicidae) revisited, with an insight on internal anatomy.

Barroso M, Moreira J, Parapar J PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13126.

PMID: 35441057 PMC: 9013482. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13126.


Mitogenome of a stink worm (Annelida: Travisiidae) includes degenerate group II intron that is also found in five congeneric species.

Kobayashi G, Itoh H, Kojima S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4449.

PMID: 35292662 PMC: 8924214. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08103-5.


Schizasterid Heart Urchins Host Microorganisms in a Digestive Symbiosis of Mesozoic Origin.

Ziegler A, Gilligan A, Dillon J, Pernet B Front Microbiol. 2020; 11:1697.

PMID: 32793161 PMC: 7387435. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01697.


References
1.
Cammen L . Ingestion rate: An empirical model for aquatic deposit feeders and detritivores. Oecologia. 2017; 44(3):303-310. DOI: 10.1007/BF00545232. View

2.
Plante C, Jumars P, Baross J . Rapid bacterial growth in the hindgut of a marine deposit feeder. Microb Ecol. 2013; 18(1):29-44. DOI: 10.1007/BF02011694. View

3.
Savory C, Gentle M . Changes in food intake and gut size in Japanese quail in response to manipulation of dietary fibre content. Br Poult Sci. 1976; 17(6):571-80. DOI: 10.1080/00071667608416315. View

4.
Gallagher E, Gardner G, Jumars P . Competition among the pioneers in a seasonal soft-bottom benthic succession: field experiments and analysis of the Gilpin-Ayala competition model. Oecologia. 2017; 83(4):427-442. DOI: 10.1007/BF00317192. View

5.
Troyer K . Diet selection and digestion in Iguana iguana: the importance of age and nutrient requirements. Oecologia. 2017; 61(2):201-207. DOI: 10.1007/BF00396761. View