» Articles » PMID: 28312281

Resource Use, Energetic Profitability, and Behavioral Decisions in Migrant Rufous Hummingbirds

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2017 Mar 18
PMID 28312281
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Migrant Rufous Hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus) defend nectar resources at stopover sites while replenishing fat reserves needed for migratory flights. During late summer in the Sandia Mountains, central New Mexico, they defend the wasp- and bee-pollinated Scrophularia montana from other hummingbirds. Both hummingbirds and hymenopterans exploit Scrophularia nectar during the early part of its flowering period. As summer colony growth increases the densities of the eusocial hymenopterans by 100-150%, their exploitation of Scrophularia nectar lowers its mean standing crop in flowers by 200-300%. Sometime during the summer, Rufous Hummingbirds abandon and do not further use this resource for the remaining 3-4 weeks of its flowering period. The abandonment always occurs when the mean standing crop of nectar is approximately 0.2-0.3 μL/ flower. This paper describes a model of Rufous Hummingbird energetics, that shows abandonment occurred 1-3 days after they passed the threshold at which the resource could have provided their minimum daily energy requirements. I suggest that constraints imposed by a highly competitive social environment severely reduced the options available to the hummingbirds, and caused them to continue to defend a resource that could no longer meet their energetic requirements.

References
1.
Carpenter F, MacMillen R . Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a hawaiian honeycreeper. Science. 1976; 194(4265):639-42. DOI: 10.1126/science.194.4265.639. View

2.
Carpenter F, MacMillen R . Energetic cost of feeding territories in an Hawaiian honeycreeper. Oecologia. 2017; 26(3):213-223. DOI: 10.1007/BF00345290. View

3.
Calder W, Booser J . Hypothermia of Broad-Tailed Hummingbirds during Incubation in Nature with Ecological Correlations. Science. 1973; 180(4087):751-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.180.4087.751. View

4.
Ewald P, Carpenter F . Territorial responses to energy manipulations in the Anna hummingbird. Oecologia. 2017; 31(3):277-292. DOI: 10.1007/BF00346248. View

5.
Carpenter F . Torpor in an andean hummingbird: its ecological significance. Science. 1974; 183(4124):545-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.183.4124.545. View