» Articles » PMID: 28311610

Photosynthetic Responses to Light Variation in Rainforest Species : I. Induction Under Constant and Fluctuating Light Conditions

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2017 Mar 18
PMID 28311610
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Photosynthetic induction under constant and fluctuating light conditions was investigated in intact leaves of Alocasia macrorrhiza and Toona australis, two species native to Australian rainforests. When leaves were exposed to saturating light following a long period at low light intensity, an induction period of 25-40 min was required before steady-state photosynthesis was achieved. A long induction period was required regardless of plant growth conditions (high vs. low light) and ambient CO concentrations during mesurement. In low-light grown A. macrorrhiza, the initial slope of the relationship between assimilation and internal CO pressure increased 7-fold from 30 s following illumination to the end of the induction period. Both stomatal and carboxylation limitations play a role in photosynthetic induction, but carboxylation limitations predominate during the first 6-10 min. In both species, leaf induction state increased 2 to 3-fold during a sequence of five 30-or 60-s lightflecks separated by 2 min of low light. Rates of induction during 60-s lightflecks and during constant illumination were similar. Induction loss in low-light grown leaves of Alocasia macrorrhiza required more than 60 min of continuous exposure to low light conditions. These results suggest that, under forest understory conditions, leaves are at intermediate induction states for most of the day. The ability to utilize sunflecks may therefore be strongly influenced by the ability of leaves to maintain relatively high states of induction during long periods of low light.

Citing Articles

Diurnal decline in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in several tropical species.

Suwannarut W, Vialet-Chabrand S, Kaiser E Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1273802.

PMID: 37941668 PMC: 10628437. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1273802.


Elevated CO Enhances Dynamic Photosynthesis in Rice and Wheat.

Kang H, Zhu T, Zhang Y, Ke X, Sun W, Hu Z Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:727374.

PMID: 34659292 PMC: 8517259. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.727374.


Concurrent Increases in Leaf Temperature With Light Accelerate Photosynthetic Induction in Tropical Tree Seedlings.

Kang H, Zhu X, Yamori W, Tang Y Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:1216.

PMID: 32849753 PMC: 7427472. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01216.


Feeding the world: improving photosynthetic efficiency for sustainable crop production.

Simkin A, Lopez-Calcagno P, Raines C J Exp Bot. 2019; 70(4):1119-1140.

PMID: 30772919 PMC: 6395887. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery445.


Elevated CO2 increases photosynthesis in fluctuating irradiance regardless of photosynthetic induction state.

Kaiser E, Zhou D, Heuvelink E, Harbinson J, Morales A, Marcelis L J Exp Bot. 2017; 68(20):5629-5640.

PMID: 29045757 PMC: 5853276. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx357.


References
1.
Osterhout W, Haas A . ON THE DYNAMICS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS. J Gen Physiol. 2009; 1(1):1-16. PMC: 2140291. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.1.1.1. View

2.
von Caemmerer S, Farquhar G . Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta. 2013; 153(4):376-87. DOI: 10.1007/BF00384257. View

3.
Pearcy R, Osteryoung K, Randall D . Carbon dioxide exchange characteristics of C Hawaiian Euphorbia species native to diverse habitats. Oecologia. 2017; 55(3):333-341. DOI: 10.1007/BF00376921. View

4.
Gross L, Chabot B . Time course of photosynthetic response to changes in incident light energy. Plant Physiol. 1979; 63(6):1033-8. PMC: 542965. DOI: 10.1104/pp.63.6.1033. View

5.
Mott K, Jensen R, Oleary J, Berry J . Photosynthesis and Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate Concentrations in Intact Leaves of Xanthium strumarium L. Plant Physiol. 1984; 76(4):968-71. PMC: 1064417. DOI: 10.1104/pp.76.4.968. View