Sources of Intraspecific Variation in the Hostplant Seeking Behavior of Colias Butterflies

Overview

Journal Oecologia

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2017 Mar 18

PMID 28310697

Citations 4

Authors

Maureen L Stanton

Robert E Cook

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Egg-laying females of the legume-feeding butterfly Colias philodice eriphyle were observed within a high-altitude study site during 1977 and 1978. Average oviposition selectivity showed two pattern sof seasonal variation. First, second brood females laid eggs more frequently after alighting upon hostplants than did first brood females in both years. Second, a consistent decline in post-alighting oviposition probability near the end of the second brood corresponded with a dramatic decrease in the water content of hostplant foliage near the end of the dry summer season. In addition to seasonal variation in oviposition behavior, individual females landed and oviposited upon widely varying sets of legume hostplant species. By sampling hostplant abundances along the flightpaths of observed females, we show that individuals varied in their tendency to land upon different hostplants. Females tended to specialize upon one or two species, at least in the short term, and the pattern of oligophagy for the population as a whole is partly generated by variation in the host-seeking behavior of individual females.

Citing Articles

Host plant utilization in the comma butterfly: sources of variation and evolutionary implications.

Janz N, Nylin S, Wedell N Oecologia. 2017; 99(1-2):132-140.

PMID: 28313958 DOI: 10.1007/BF00317093.

Reciprocal latitudinal clines in oviposition behavior ofPapilio glaucus andP. canadensis across the Great Lakes hybrid zone: possible sex-linkage of oviposition preferences.

Scriber J, Giebink B, Snider D Oecologia. 2017; 87(3):360-368.

PMID: 28313263 DOI: 10.1007/BF00634592.

Host plant discrimination in tropical satyrine butterflies.

Moore G Oecologia. 2017; 70(4):592-595.

PMID: 28311505 DOI: 10.1007/BF00379910.

Forms of Melanoplus bowditchi (Orthoptera: Acrididae) collected from different host plants are indistinguishable genetically and in aedeagal morphology.

Ullah M, Mustafa F, Kneeland K, Brust M, Hoback W, Kamble S PeerJ. 2014; 2:e418.

PMID: 24949237 PMC: 4060019. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.418.

References

Tabashnik B . Population structure of pierid butterflies : III. Pest populations of Colias philodice eriphyle. Oecologia. 2017; 47(2):175-183. DOI: 10.1007/BF00346817. View

Richards L, Myers J . Maternal influences on size and emergence time of the cinnabar moth. Can J Zool. 1980; 58(8):1452-7. DOI: 10.1139/z80-199. View

Watt W . Adaptation at specific loci. I. Natural selection on phosphoglucose isomerase of Colias butterflies: Biochemical and population aspects. Genetics. 1977; 87(1):177-94. PMC: 1213725. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/87.1.177. View

Rausher M . Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science. 1978; 200(4345):1071-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.200.4345.1071. View

Tabashnik B . Responses of pest and non-pest Colias butterfly larvae to intraspecific variation in leaf nitrogen and water content. Oecologia. 2017; 55(3):389-394. DOI: 10.1007/BF00376927. View

Watt W, Han D, Tabashnik B . Population structure of pierid butterflies : II. A "Native" population of Colias philodice eriphyle in Colorado. Oecologia. 2017; 44(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1007/BF00346396. View

Dunlap-Pianka H, Boggs C, Gilbert L . Ovarian Dynamics in Heliconiine Butterflies: Programmed Senescence versus Eternal Youth. Science. 1977; 197(4302):487-90. DOI: 10.1126/science.197.4302.487. View

Singer M . DETERMINANTS OF MULTIPLE HOST USE BY A PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECT POPULATION. Evolution. 2017; 37(2):389-403. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05547.x. View

Fox L, Morrow P . Specialization: species property or local phenomenon?. Science. 1981; 211(4485):887-93. DOI: 10.1126/science.211.4485.887. View

10.

Boggs C, Gilbert L . Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science. 1979; 206(4414):83-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.206.4414.83. View

11.

Tabashnik B, Wheelock H, Rainbolt J, Watt W . Individual variation in oviposition preference in the butterfly, Colias eurytheme. Oecologia. 2017; 50(2):225-230. DOI: 10.1007/BF00348042. View

12.

Singer M . Complex Components of Habitat Suitability within a Butterfly Colony. Science. 1972; 176(4030):75-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.176.4030.75. View

13.

Stanton M . The role of chemotactile stimuli in the oviposition preferences of Colias butterflies. Oecologia. 2017; 39(1):79-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF00345999. View

14.

Benson W, Brown Jr K, Gilbert L . COEVOLUTION OF PLANTS AND HERBIVORES: PASSION FLOWER BUTTERFLIES. Evolution. 2017; 29(4):659-680. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00861.x. View

15.

Hayes J . The population ecology of a natural population of the pierid butterfly Colias alexandra. Oecologia. 2017; 49(2):188-200. DOI: 10.1007/BF00349187. View

16.

Labine P . THE POPULATION BIOLOGY OF THE BUTTERFLY, EUPHYDRYAS EDITHA. VIII. OVIPOSITION AND ITS RELATION TO PATTERNS OF OVIPOSITION IN OTHER BUTTERFLIES. Evolution. 2017; 22(4):799-805. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1968.tb03478.x. View

17.

Rausher M . HOST ABUNDANCE, JUVENILE SURVIVAL, AND OVIPOSITION PREFERENCE IN BATTUS PHILENOR. Evolution. 2017; 34(2):342-355. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04823.x. View