Attitudes and Experiences with Secondhand Smoke and Smoke-free Policies Among Subsidised and Market-rate Multiunit Housing Residents Living in Six Diverse Communities in the USA

Overview

Journal Tob Control

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2017 Mar 18

PMID 28302920

Citations 18

Authors

Andrea S Gentzke

Andrew Hyland

Marc Kiviniemi

Mark J Travers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Given that higher smoking rates persist among lower socioeconomic populations, multiunit housing (MUH) environments may result in higher secondhand smoke (SHS) exposures among subsidised MUH residents. This cross-sectional assessment compares experiences with SHS and smoke-free policies among subsidised and market-rate MUH residents living in six US communities.

Methods: MUH residents (n=1565) were surveyed regarding their smoke-free rules (home and building), SHS exposures and preferences towards smoke-free policies. Binary logistic regression identified predictors of each outcome, focusing on differences by subsidised housing status (subsidised vs market rate).

Results: Among residents enforcing smoke-free home rules (76%, overall), 50% reported SHS incursions into their unit. Only 23% reported living in a smoke-free building; 56% of those living in smoking-allowable buildings reported preferences towards smoke-free building policies. Among market-rate housing residents, smoke-free home (OR=4.18) and building (OR=2.26) rules were significantly higher when children were present. Smoke-free building rules reduced the odds of SHS incursions among market-rate housing residents (OR=0.50), but no association was observed among subsidised housing residents. Non-smoking subsidised housing residents exhibited stronger preferences for smoke-free policies compared with those in market-rate housing.

Discussion: Smoke-free home rules may not protect MUH residents from SHS exposures, particularly in subsidised MUH. Although strong preferences towards smoke-free policies were present overall, subsidised MUH residents may have fewer alternative smoke-free housing options available. Therefore, all publicly funded housing should be smoke free to protect these vulnerable populations. However, continued efforts to encourage privately owned MUH operators to adopt smoke-free policies are also necessary.

Citing Articles

Indoor Air Quality in Multi-Family Housing: Drivers and Interventions.

Levy J, Kibilko K Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025; 12(1):4.

PMID: 39804430 PMC: 11729057. DOI: 10.1007/s40572-024-00470-7.

Secondhand smoke exposure and associated factors among city residents living in multiunit housing in Bangladesh.

Kibria M, Hossain A, Islam T, Islam K, Mahmud H, Nabi M PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0291746.

PMID: 37733729 PMC: 10513191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291746.

Disparities in Smokefree and Vapefree Home Rules and Smokefree Policy Attitudes Based on Housing Type and Cigarette Smoking Status, United States, 2019.

Reyes-Guzman C, Patel M, Wang T, Corcy N, Chomenko D, Slotman B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(14).

PMID: 37510588 PMC: 10379655. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20146356.

Public support for smoke-free policies in outdoor areas and (semi-)private places: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Boderie N, Sheikh A, Lo E, Sheikh A, Burdorf A, van Lenthe F EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 59:101982.

PMID: 37256097 PMC: 10225670. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101982.

Invited Commentary: Use of Epidemiologic Methods to Guide Comprehensive and Equitable Approaches to Policy.

Widome R Am J Epidemiol. 2022; 192(1):34-38.

PMID: 36255180 PMC: 10144725. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwac184.

References

King B, Cummings K, Mahoney M, Juster H, Hyland A . Multiunit housing residents' experiences and attitudes toward smoke-free policies. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010; 12(6):598-605. PMC: 3436441. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntq053. View

Licht A, King B, Travers M, Rivard C, Hyland A . Attitudes, experiences, and acceptance of smoke-free policies among US multiunit housing residents. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(10):1868-71. PMC: 3490662. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300717. View

Hewett M, Sandell S, Anderson J, Niebuhr M . Secondhand smoke in apartment buildings: renter and owner or manager perspectives. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007; 9 Suppl 1:S39-47. DOI: 10.1080/14622200601083442. View

Hood N, Ferketich A, Klein E, Wewers M, Pirie P . Individual, social, and environmental factors associated with support for smoke-free housing policies among subsidized multiunit housing tenants. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012; 15(6):1075-83. PMC: 3646651. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts246. View

Spengler J . Buildings operations and ETS exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 1999; 107 Suppl 2:313-7. PMC: 1566273. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107s2313. View

Hennrikus D, Pentel P, Sandell S . Preferences and practices among renters regarding smoking restrictions in apartment buildings. Tob Control. 2003; 12(2):189-94. PMC: 1747712. DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.2.189. View

. Vital signs: nonsmokers' exposure to secondhand smoke --- United States, 1999-2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010; 59(35):1141-6. View

King B, Dube S, Homa D . Smoke-free rules and secondhand smoke exposure in homes and vehicles among US adults, 2009-2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10:E79. PMC: 3666976. DOI: 10.5888/pcd10.120218. View

King B, Patel R, Babb S . Prevalence of smokefree home rules--United States, 1992-1993 and 2010-2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014; 63(35):765-9. PMC: 5779448. View

10.

Hyland A, Higbee C, Borland R, Travers M, Hastings G, Fong G . Attitudes and beliefs about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11(6):642-9. PMC: 2688606. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp063. View

11.

Pizacani B, Maher J, Rohde K, Drach L, Stark M . Implementation of a smoke-free policy in subsidized multiunit housing: effects on smoking cessation and secondhand smoke exposure. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012; 14(9):1027-34. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr334. View

12.

Gan W, Mannino D, Jemal A . Socioeconomic disparities in secondhand smoke exposure among US never-smoking adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-2010. Tob Control. 2014; 24(6):568-73. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051660. View

13.

Hewett M, Ortland W, Brock B, Heim C . Secondhand smoke and smokefree policies in owner-occupied multi-unit housing. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(5 Suppl 3):S187-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.039. View

14.

Ballor D, Henson H, Macguire K . Support for no-smoking policies among residents of public multiunit housing differs by smoking status. J Community Health. 2013; 38(6):1074-80. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9716-7. View

15.

Agaku I, King B, Dube S . Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2005-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014; 63(2):29-34. PMC: 4584648. View

16.

Wilson K, Klein J, Blumkin A, Gottlieb M, Winickoff J . Tobacco-smoke exposure in children who live in multiunit housing. Pediatrics. 2010; 127(1):85-92. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2046. View

17.

Russo E, Hulse T, Adamkiewicz G, Levy D, Bethune L, Kane J . Comparison of indoor air quality in smoke-permitted and smoke-free multiunit housing: findings from the Boston Housing Authority. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014; 17(3):316-22. PMC: 4837992. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu146. View

18.

Drach L, Pizacani B, Rohde K, Schubert S . The acceptability of comprehensive smoke-free policies to low-income tenants in subsidized housing. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010; 7(3):A66. PMC: 2879998. View

19.

Bohac D, Hewett M, Hammond S, Grimsrud D . Secondhand smoke transfer and reductions by air sealing and ventilation in multiunit buildings: PFT and nicotine verification. Indoor Air. 2010; 21(1):36-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00680.x. View

20.

Baezconde-Garbanati L, Weich-Reushe K, Espinoza L, Portugal C, Barahona R, Garbanati J . Secondhand smoke exposure among Hispanics/Latinos living in multiunit housing: exploring barriers to new policies. Am J Health Promot. 2011; 25(5 Suppl):S82-90. PMC: 4141770. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.100628-QUAL-219. View