» Articles » PMID: 28297654

Role of Pore-Lining Residues in Defining the Rate of Water Conduction by Aquaporin-0

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2017 Mar 16
PMID 28297654
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Compared to other aquaporins (AQPs), lens-specific AQP0 is a poor water channel, and its permeability was reported to be pH-dependent. To date, most water conduction studies on AQP0 were performed on protein expressed in Xenopus oocytes, and the results may therefore also reflect effects introduced by the oocytes themselves. Experiments with purified AQP0 reconstituted into liposomes are challenging because the water permeability of AQP0 is only slightly higher than that of pure lipid bilayers. By reconstituting high amounts of AQP0 and using high concentrations of cholesterol to reduce the permeability of the lipid bilayer, we improved the signal-to-noise ratio of water permeability measurements on AQP0 proteoliposomes. Our measurements show that mutation of two pore-lining tyrosine residues, Tyr-23 and Tyr-149 in sheep AQP0, to the corresponding residues in the high-permeability water channel AQP1 have additive effects and together increase the water permeability of AQP0 40-fold to a level comparable to that of AQP1. Molecular dynamics simulations qualitatively support these experimental findings and suggest that mutation of Tyr-23 changes the pore profile at the gate formed by residue Arg-187.

Citing Articles

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Eye Lens Water Channel Aquaporin 0 from Fish.

Freites J, Tobias D J Phys Chem B. 2024; 128(31):7577-7585.

PMID: 39052430 PMC: 11317983. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c03015.


The role of phosphorylation in calmodulin-mediated gating of human AQP0.

Kreida S, Roche J, Missel J, Al-Jubair T, Hagstromer C, Wittenbecher V Biochem J. 2023; 481(1):17-32.

PMID: 38032258 PMC: 10903448. DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20230158.


Multiple pore lining residues modulate water permeability of GlpF.

Pluhackova K, Schittny V, Burkner P, Siligan C, Horner A Protein Sci. 2022; 31(10):e4431.

PMID: 36173178 PMC: 9490802. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4431.


The Transporter-Mediated Cellular Uptake and Efflux of Pharmaceutical Drugs and Biotechnology Products: How and Why Phospholipid Bilayer Transport Is Negligible in Real Biomembranes.

Kell D Molecules. 2021; 26(18).

PMID: 34577099 PMC: 8470029. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26185629.


Modeling water purification by an aquaporin-inspired graphene-based nano-channel.

Lohrasebi A, Koslowski T J Mol Model. 2019; 25(9):280.

PMID: 31463758 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-019-4160-y.


References
1.
Chandy G, Zampighi G, Kreman M, Hall J . Comparison of the water transporting properties of MIP and AQP1. J Membr Biol. 1997; 159(1):29-39. DOI: 10.1007/s002329900266. View

2.
Costello M, McIntosh T, ROBERTSON J . Distribution of gap junctions and square array junctions in the mammalian lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989; 30(5):975-89. View

3.
Qiu H, Ma S, Shen R, Guo W . Dynamic and energetic mechanisms for the distinct permeation rate in AQP1 and AQP0. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009; 1798(3):318-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.11.015. View

4.
Smart O, Neduvelil J, Wang X, Wallace B, Sansom M . HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J Mol Graph. 1996; 14(6):354-60, 376. DOI: 10.1016/s0263-7855(97)00009-x. View

5.
Mathai J, Tristram-Nagle S, Nagle J, Zeidel M . Structural determinants of water permeability through the lipid membrane. J Gen Physiol. 2008; 131(1):69-76. PMC: 2174160. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200709848. View