» Articles » PMID: 28292293

Batwing Versus Wise Pattern Mammoplasty for Upper Pole Breast Tumours: a Detailed Comparison of Cosmetic Outcome

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Mar 16
PMID 28292293
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the results of batwing mammoplasty and Wise pattern mammoplasty in the surgical management of upper pole breast tumours.

Methods: This is a retrospective observational study including 126 breast cancer patients who presented between 2009 and 2015 to the National Cancer Institute of Cairo University in Egypt. All patients were candidates for breast conservation, with upper pole tumours, which was defined as tumours between 3 and 9 o'clock. Patients were categorized into two groups. Group A (64) included patients who underwent inferiorly based therapeutic mammoplasty, while group B (62) was designated for patients who had batwing mammoplasty. The results of both groups were compared and analyzed.

Results: Wise pattern mammoplasty group had statistically significant higher complication rate. The overall aesthetic result of Wise pattern technique was superior to batwing mammoplasty. However, batwing mammoplasty showed a statistically significant higher rate of patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: Both techniques are valid options for upper pole breast tumours. Wise pattern therapeutic mammoplasty remains aesthetically superior; however, batwing mammoplasty is an easy, simple technique with acceptable results to patients.

Citing Articles

Use of patient-reported outcome measures after breast reconstruction in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Malapati S, Hyland C, Liang G, Edelen M, Fazzalari A, Kaur M J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024; 8(1):25.

PMID: 38416222 PMC: 10899941. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00687-y.


Outcome reporting in therapeutic mammaplasty: a systematic review.

Lee A, Kwasnicki R, Khan H, Grant Y, Chan A, Fanshawe A BJS Open. 2021; 5(6).

PMID: 34894122 PMC: 8665419. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab126.


Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.

Nanda A, Hu J, Hodgkinson S, Ali S, Rainsbury R, Roy P Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 10:CD013658.

PMID: 34713449 PMC: 8554646. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013658.pub2.


Assessment of breast symmetry in breast cancer patients undergoing therapeutic mammaplasty using the Breast Cancer Conservation Therapy cosmetic results software (BCCT.core).

Baldacchino R, Bellizzi A, Madada-Nyakauru R, Kazzazi F, Oni G, Forouhi P Gland Surg. 2019; 8(3):218-225.

PMID: 31328100 PMC: 6606477. DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.09.06.


Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap as an autologous alternative to acellular dermal matrix.

Hashem T, Farahat A World J Surg Oncol. 2017; 15(1):185.

PMID: 29037204 PMC: 5644174. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1254-9.

References
1.
Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R . Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115(3):743-51. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000152435.03538.43. View

2.
van Dongen J, Voogd A, Fentiman I, LeGrand C, Sylvester R, Tong D . Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(14):1143-50. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.14.1143. View

3.
Anderson B, Masetti R, Silverstein M . Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6(3):145-57. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)01765-1. View

4.
Munhoz A, Montag E, Arruda E, Pellarin L, Filassi J, Piato J . Assessment of immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction: a classification system of defects revisited and an algorithm for selecting the appropriate technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121(3):716-727. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000299295.74100.fa. View

5.
Clough K, Kaufman G, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati I . Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17(5):1375-91. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0792-y. View