» Articles » PMID: 28290469

Longitudinal Employment Outcomes of an Early Intervention Vocational Rehabilitation Service for People Admitted to Rehabilitation with a Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Overview
Journal Spinal Cord
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Mar 15
PMID 28290469
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Longitudinal cohort design.

Objectives: First, to explore the longitudinal outcomes for people who received early intervention vocational rehabilitation (EIVR); second, to examine the nature and extent of relationships between contextual factors and employment outcomes over time.

Setting: Both inpatient and community-based clients of a Spinal Community Integration Service (SCIS).

Methods: People of workforce age undergoing inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic spinal cord injury were invited to participate in EIVR as part of SCIS. Data were collected at the following three time points: discharge and at 1 year and 2+ years post discharge. Measures included the spinal cord independence measure, hospital anxiety and depression scale, impact on participation and autonomy scale, numerical pain-rating scale and personal wellbeing index. A range of chi square, correlation and regression tests were undertaken to look for relationships between employment outcomes and demographic, emotional and physical characteristics.

Results: Ninety-seven participants were recruited and 60 were available at the final time point where 33% (95% confidence interval (CI): 24-42%) had achieved an employment outcome. Greater social participation was strongly correlated with wellbeing (ρ=0.692), and reduced anxiety (ρ=-0.522), depression (ρ=-0.643) and pain (ρ=-0.427) at the final time point. In a generalised linear mixed effect model, education status, relationship status and subjective wellbeing increased significantly the odds of being employed at the final time point. Tertiary education prior to injury was associated with eight times increased odds of being in employment at the final time point; being in a relationship at the time of injury was associated with increased odds of being in employment of more than 3.5; subjective wellbeing, while being the least powerful predictor was still associated with increased odds (1.8 times) of being employed at the final time point.

Conclusions: EIVR shows promise in delivering similar return-to-work rates as those traditionally reported, but sooner. The dynamics around relationships, subjective wellbeing, social participation and employment outcomes require further exploration.

Citing Articles

Benefits and barriers to return to education and relationship to quality of life for people living with spinal cord injury: Results of a mixed methods study.

Hsieh S, De Simone A, Dyson-Hudson T, ONeill J, Botticello A, Chen A J Spinal Cord Med. 2024; 48(2):327-337.

PMID: 38240674 PMC: 11864026. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2294520.


Neurologic morbidity and functional independence in adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Vuotto S, Wang M, Okcu M, Bowers D, Ullrich N, Ness K Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2023; 11(2):291-301.

PMID: 38013658 PMC: 10863908. DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51951.


United and flexible: a collaborative approach to early vocational rehabilitation on a spinal unit. A realist study.

Timothy E, Bourke J, Dunn J, Martin R, Nunnerley J Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2023; 9(1):33.

PMID: 37443167 PMC: 10344866. DOI: 10.1038/s41394-023-00587-1.


Developing A Conceptual Framework for Early Intervention Vocational Rehabilitation for People Following Spinal Cord Injury.

Dunn J, Martin R, Hackney J, Nunnerley J, Snell D, Bourke J J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 33(1):179-188.

PMID: 35927599 PMC: 10025215. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10060-9.


Does Gratitude Ensure Workplace Happiness Among University Teachers? Examining the Role of Social and Psychological Capital and Spiritual Climate.

Garg N, Mahipalan M, Poulose S, Burgess J Front Psychol. 2022; 13:849412.

PMID: 35529571 PMC: 9072633. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849412.


References
1.
Craig A, Nicholson Perry K, Guest R, Tran Y, Middleton J . Adjustment following chronic spinal cord injury: Determining factors that contribute to social participation. Br J Health Psychol. 2015; 20(4):807-23. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12143. View

2.
Trenaman L, Miller W, Queree M, Escorpizo R . Modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with employment outcomes following spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015; 38(4):422-31. PMC: 4612197. DOI: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000031. View

3.
Ottomanelli L, Barnett S, Goetz L . Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injury: 2-year results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 95(4):784-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.012. View

4.
Cardol M, de Haan R, de Jong B, van den Bos G, de Groot I . Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82(2):210-6. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.18218. View

5.
Schonherr M, Groothoff J, Mulder G, Schoppen T, Eisma W . Vocational reintegration following spinal cord injury: expectations, participation and interventions. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101581. View