» Articles » PMID: 28289859

Diagnosis of Swallowing Disorders: How We Interpret Pharyngeal Manometry

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Mar 15
PMID 28289859
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: We provide an overview of the clinical application of novel pharyngeal high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) with pressure flow analysis (PFA) in our hands with example cases.

Recent Findings: In our Centre, we base our interpretation of HRIM recordings upon a qualitative assessment of pressure-impedance waveforms during individual swallows, as well as a quantitative assessment of averaged PFA swallow function variables. We provide a description of two global swallowing efficacy measures, the swallow risk index (SRI), reflecting global swallowing dysfunction (higher SRI = greater aspiration risk) and the post-swallow impedance ratio (PSIR) detecting significant post-swallow bolus residue. We describe a further eight swallow function variables specific to the hypopharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES), assessing hypo-pharyngeal distension pressure, contractility, bolus presence and flow timing, and UES basal tone, relaxation, opening and contractility. Pharyngeal HRIM has now come of age, being applicable for routine clinical practice to assess the biomechanics of oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction. In the future, it may guide treatment strategies and allow more objective longitudinal follow-up on clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

Pharyngeal adaptation to bolus properties in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Saleem S, Miles A, Allen J Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(10):5375-5383.

PMID: 38867001 PMC: 11416356. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08774-y.


Cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction: a poorly defined disorder from diagnosis to treatment.

Krekeler B, Howell R Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(9):4519-4527.

PMID: 38714548 PMC: 11392647. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08644-7.


Characterization of pharyngeal contractile integral using pharyngeal manometry in children.

Damrongmanee A, El-Chammas K, Santucci N, Fei L, Kaul A J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024; 78(4):783-789.

PMID: 38314945 PMC: 11111290. DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.12140.


Normal Variations in Upper Esophageal Sphincter Function During Deglutition: A Secondary Analysis of Videofluoroscopic Data.

Ambrocio K, Ramsey R, ORourke A, Beall J, Garand K Laryngoscope. 2023; 134(5):2306-2315.

PMID: 37962100 PMC: 11006589. DOI: 10.1002/lary.31173.


Swallowing biomechanics in tracheostomised critically ill patients compared to age- and gender-matched healthy controls.

Cheriyan S, Schar M, Woods C, Bihari S, Cock C, Athanasiadis T Crit Care Resusc. 2023; 25(2):97-105.

PMID: 37876599 PMC: 10581277. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.05.007.


References
1.
Williams R, Wallace K, Ali G, Cook I . Biomechanics of failed deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation in neurogenic dysphagia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002; 283(1):G16-26. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00189.2001. View

2.
Omari T, Dejaeger E, Tack J, Vanbeckevoort D, Rommel N . An impedance-manometry based method for non-radiological detection of pharyngeal postswallow residue. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012; 24(7):e277-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01931.x. View

3.
Weijenborg P, Kessing B, Smout A, Bredenoord A . Normal values for solid-state esophageal high-resolution manometry in a European population; an overview of all current metrics. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014; 26(5):654-9. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12314. View

4.
Williams R, Grehan M, Hersch M, Andre J, Cook I . Biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment outcome in inflammatory myopathy presenting as oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gut. 2003; 52(4):471-8. PMC: 1773618. DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.4.471. View

5.
Cock C, Besanko L, Kritas S, Burgstad C, Thompson A, Heddle R . Maximum upper esophageal sphincter (UES) admittance: a non-specific marker of UES dysfunction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 28(2):225-33. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12714. View