» Articles » PMID: 28288834

Exception Points and Body Size Contribute to Gender Disparity in Liver Transplantation

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Mar 15
PMID 28288834
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: Women are significantly less likely than men to receive a liver transplant and more likely to die on the waitlist. We investigated potential reasons for these disparities, including match run positioning and organ declines caused by small stature of female recipients.

Methods: We analyzed data from the United Network of Organ Sharing registry of candidates placed on the waitlist from May 10, 2007, through June 17, 2013. Primary outcomes included ranked in first position on a match run, having an organ declined while in first position, declining an organ while in first position because of size mismatch between donor and recipient (body surface area discordance), and death or becoming too sick for liver transplantation.

Results: Among 64,995 patients on the waitlist for liver transplantation, 23.1% of men and 15.6% of women received exception points (P < .001). Women listed without exception points were less likely than men to be ranked first (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99). Women who achieved first position were more likely to decline an organ than men (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26); this difference was reduced after we accounted for recipient body surface area (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.98-1.19). Women with a single organ decline were more likely than men with a single organ decline to die or become too sick for transplantation (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12-1.41). The difference was reduced after we accounted for exception points (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12-1.21) and recipient body surface area (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96-1.06).

Conclusions: In an analysis of data from the United Network of Organ Sharing registry, we found that women when compared with men on the waitlist for liver transplantation are disadvantaged by an imbalance in exception point allocation and organ declines because of small stature.

Citing Articles

A Comprehensive Assessment of Liver Transplant Trends and Outcomes Among Adults With Steatotic Liver Disease in the U.S.

Patel S, Patel S, Zhang W, Singal A, Cheung R, Wong R Gastro Hep Adv. 2025; 4(4):100609.

PMID: 40026700 PMC: 11869966. DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.100609.


Systematic Sex-Based Inequity in the MELD Score-Based Allocation System for Liver Transplantation in Germany.

Wiering L, Aigner A, van Rosmalen M, Globke B, Dziodzio T, Raschzok N Transpl Int. 2025; 38:13844.

PMID: 39944216 PMC: 11813689. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2025.13844.


Examining the Relationship Between Healthy Life Awareness and Psychological Well-Being in Liver Transplantation Patients: A Structural Equation Model.

Mese S, Harmanci P Nurs Health Sci. 2025; 27(1):e70061.

PMID: 39914803 PMC: 11802265. DOI: 10.1111/nhs.70061.


Patient sex and use of tranexamic acid in liver transplantation.

Dehne S, Jackson-Gil L, Riede C, Feisst M, Mehrabi A, Michalski C Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1452733.

PMID: 39376656 PMC: 11456493. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1452733.


Women Are Also Disadvantaged in Accessing Transplant Outside the United States: Analysis of the Spanish Liver Transplantation Registry.

Tejedor M, Neria F, de la Rosa G, Almohalla Alvarez C, Padilla M, Bosca Robledo A Transpl Int. 2024; 37:12732.

PMID: 38773987 PMC: 11106452. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12732.


References
1.
Lai J, Feng S, Roberts J . An examination of liver offers to candidates on the liver transplant wait-list. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(5):1261-1265. PMC: 3480537. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.105. View

2.
Mindikoglu A, Regev A, Seliger S, Magder L . Gender disparity in liver transplant waiting-list mortality: the importance of kidney function. Liver Transpl. 2010; 16(10):1147-57. PMC: 3119710. DOI: 10.1002/lt.22121. View

3.
Marvin M, Ferguson N, Cannon R, Jones C, Brock G . MELDEQ : An alternative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2015; 21(5):612-22. DOI: 10.1002/lt.24098. View

4.
Segev D, Kucirka L, Oberai P, Parekh R, Boulware L, Powe N . Age and comorbidities are effect modifiers of gender disparities in renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20(3):621-8. PMC: 2653677. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2008060591. View

5.
Urata K, Kawasaki S, Matsunami H, Hashikura Y, Ikegami T, Ishizone S . Calculation of child and adult standard liver volume for liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1995; 21(5):1317-21. View