» Articles » PMID: 28287532

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing

Overview
Journal J Vis Exp
Date 2017 Mar 14
PMID 28287532
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Central facilitation and modulation of incoming nociceptive signals play an important role in the perception of pain. Disruption in central pain processing is present in many chronic pain conditions and can influence responses to specific therapies. Thus, the ability to precisely describe the state of central pain processing has profound clinical significance in both prognosis and prediction. Because it is not practical to record neuronal firings directly in the human spinal cord, surrogate behavior tests become an important tool to assess the state of central pain processing. Dynamic QST is one such test, and can probe both the ascending facilitation and descending modulation of incoming nociceptive signals via TS and CPM, respectively. Due to the large between-individual variability in the sensitivity to noxious signals, standardized TS and CPM tests may not yield any meaningful data in up to 50% of the population due to floor or ceiling effects. We present methodologies to individualize TS and CPM so we can capture these measures in a broader range of individuals than previously possible. We have used these methods successfully in several studies at the lab, and data from one ongoing study will be presented to demonstrate feasibility and potential applications of the methods.

Citing Articles

The Endogenous Pain Modulatory System as a Healing Mechanism: A Proposal on How to Measure and Modulate It.

de Melo P, Pacheco-Barrios K, Marduy A, Vasquez-Avila K, Simis M, Imamura M NeuroSci. 2024; 5(3):230-243.

PMID: 39483278 PMC: 11469741. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci5030018.


Predictive and concurrent validity of pain sensitivity phenotype, neuropeptidomics and neuroepigenetics in the MI-RAT osteoarthritic surgical model in rats.

Otis C, Cristofanilli K, Frezier M, Delsart A, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier J Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1400650.

PMID: 39175874 PMC: 11338919. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1400650.


Augmented Central Pain Processing Occurs after Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures and Is Associated with Residual Back Pain after Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.

Chen K, Gao T, Zhu Y, Lyu F, Jiang J, Zheng C Asian Spine J. 2024; 18(3):380-389.

PMID: 38764226 PMC: 11222882. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0429.


The effects of neck exercise in comparison to passive or no intervention on quantitative sensory testing measurements in adults with chronic neck pain: A systematic review.

Osborne D, Jadhakhan F, Falla D PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303166.

PMID: 38701102 PMC: 11068209. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303166.


Optimizing Temporal Summation of Heat Pain Using a Constant Contact Heat Stimulator.

Kell P, Vore C, Hahn B, Payne M, Rhudy J J Pain Res. 2024; 17:583-598.

PMID: 38347852 PMC: 10860393. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S439862.


References
1.
Arendt-Nielsen L, Petersen-Felix S . Wind-up and neuroplasticity: is there a correlation to clinical pain?. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 1995; 10:1-7. View

2.
Bernaba M, Johnson K, Kong J, Mackey S . Conditioned pain modulation is minimally influenced by cognitive evaluation or imagery of the conditioning stimulus. J Pain Res. 2014; 7:689-97. PMC: 4251756. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S65607. View

3.
Robinson M, Bialosky J, Bishop M, Price D, George S . Supra-threshold scaling, temporal summation, and after-sensation: relationships to each other and anxiety/fear. J Pain Res. 2011; 3:25-32. PMC: 3004634. DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s9462. View

4.
Raphael K, Janal M, Anathan S, Cook D, Staud R . Temporal summation of heat pain in temporomandibular disorder patients. J Orofac Pain. 2009; 23(1):54-64. PMC: 2652673. View

5.
Kong J, Johnson K, Balise R, Mackey S . Test-retest reliability of thermal temporal summation using an individualized protocol. J Pain. 2013; 14(1):79-88. PMC: 3541942. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.10.010. View