» Articles » PMID: 28286927

Murray Secretion Scale and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in Predicting Aspiration in Dysphagic Patients

Overview
Date 2017 Mar 14
PMID 28286927
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this retrospective review is to evaluate the ability of the Murray secretion scale to predict aspiration as determined by fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Patients with dysphagia undergoing a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing study between January 2013 and November 2015 from a single, tertiary care institution were retrospectively reviewed. The Murray secretion scale and penetration aspiration scale on fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing examination were determined. Spearman's correlation analysis, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and relative risk evaluating the relationship between the Murray secretion scale and aspiration on fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing were calculated. Subgroups of head and neck cancer patients, penetration group, and aspiration group were also analyzed. The mean age of the cases (N = 212) was 62.4 years. Eighty percent were male. There was a strong correlation between Murray secretion scale grade and penetration aspiration scale score (r = 0.785, p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of a Murray secretion scale grade 2 or higher in predicting aspiration were 74 and 90%, respectively. Individuals with a Murray secretion scale grade of 2 or higher were 13.6 times more likely to aspirate than patients with a lower Murray secretion scale grade. All subgroups showed similar trend. Determination of a Murray secretion scale grade, determined by flexible nasopharyngoscopy, may predict patients at high risk for aspiration. In clinical scenarios where more complete assessments of aspiration risk are immediately impossible or impractical, the Murray secretion scale grade may add valuable information to assist in clinical decision-making in patients with dysphagia.

Citing Articles

Predictive Power of Pharyngolaryngeal Secretion Accumulations for Penetration and Aspiration in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Hotzel J, Zaretsky E, Goeze A, Hey C Dysphagia. 2025; .

PMID: 39939562 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-024-10801-3.


Machine learning predictive model for aspiration risk in early enteral nutrition patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Zhang B, Xu H, Xiao Q, Wei W, Ma Y, Chen X Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40236.

PMID: 39654732 PMC: 11626782. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40236.


Correlation between pharyngeal residue and penetration/aspiration in post-stroke individuals.

Guijo L, Pilon J, Cola P, da Silva R, Onofri S Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 282(1):371-375.

PMID: 39551827 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-09069-y.


The effect and mechanism of motor imagery based on action observation treatment on dysphagia in Wallenberg Syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Wang L, Li Y, Liu R, Li H, Wang L, Yuan Y Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024; 60(6):938-948.

PMID: 39374050 PMC: 11713630. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08471-5.


Validation of the Swedish Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity for Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (DIGEST-FEES).

Petersson K, Finizia C, Pauli N, Tuomi L Dysphagia. 2024; .

PMID: 39331200 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-024-10759-2.


References
1.
Kaspar K, Ekberg O . Identifying vulnerable patients: role of the EAT-10 and the multidisciplinary team for early intervention and comprehensive dysphagia care. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2012; 72:19-31. DOI: 10.1159/000339977. View

2.
Butler S, Markley L, Sanders B, Stuart A . Reliability of the penetration aspiration scale with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015; 124(6):480-3. DOI: 10.1177/0003489414566267. View

3.
Murray J, Langmore S, Ginsberg S, Dostie A . The significance of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions and swallowing frequency in predicting aspiration. Dysphagia. 1996; 11(2):99-103. DOI: 10.1007/BF00417898. View

4.
Steele C, Greenwood C, Ens I, Robertson C . Mealtime difficulties in a home for the aged: not just dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1997; 12(1):43-50; discussion 51. DOI: 10.1007/pl00009517. View

5.
Langmore S . Evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia: which diagnostic tool is superior?. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 11(6):485-9. DOI: 10.1097/00020840-200312000-00014. View