Patient Autonomy and Quality of Care in Telehealthcare

Overview

Journal Sci Eng Ethics

Date 2017 Mar 11

PMID 28281148

Citations 20

Authors

Giovanni Rubeis

Maximilian Schochow

Florian Steger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Telemedicine is a complex field including various applications and target groups. Especially telehealthcare is seen by many as a means to revolutionize medicine. It gives patients the opportunity to take charge of their own health by using self-tracking devices and allows health professionals to treat patients from a distance. To some, this means an empowerment of patient autonomy as well as an improvement in the quality of care. Others state the dangers of depersonalization of medicine and the pathologization of daily life. This paper examines the ethical implications of telehealthcare, focusing on patient autonomy and quality of care by analyzing metareviews, randomized controlled trials and narrative ethical analyses on the topic. As a result, we conclude that the technically enhanced encounter between patients and health professionals may mean an empowerment of patient autonomy when it goes along with a personal relationship based on trust, assistance and support. When it comes to the quality of care, telehealthcare may lead to an improvement as long it is adopted to the patient's individual needs.

Citing Articles

The Association of Psychological Factors With Willingness to Share Health-Related Data From Technological Devices: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Eversdijk M, Douma E, Habibovic M, Kop W JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e64244.

PMID: 39864105 PMC: 11780973. DOI: 10.2196/64244.

Methodology for a Series of Rapid Reviews on Virtual Care in Rehabilitation, Reviewing Its Advantages and Challenges to Inform Best Practices.

Sigouin J, Hudon A, Veras M, Beaulieu-Bonneau S, Cavallo S, Kairy D Clin Pract. 2024; 14(6):2713-2724.

PMID: 39727802 PMC: 11674943. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14060214.

Ethical acceptability of telemedicine: Nursing home resident's perspective on telemedical consultations.

Sira N, Gross D, Wilhelmy S Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241288368.

PMID: 39484651 PMC: 11526395. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241288368.

Rethinking Health Recommender Systems for Active Aging: An Autonomy-Based Ethical Analysis.

Tiribelli S, Calvaresi D Sci Eng Ethics. 2024; 30(3):22.

PMID: 38801621 PMC: 11129984. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-024-00479-z.

Personalizing Communication of Clinicians with Chronically Ill Elders in Digital Encounters-A Patient-Centered View.

Gabay G, Ornoy H, Gere A, Moskowitz H Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38391809 PMC: 10888115. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12040434.

References

Ekeland A, Bowes A, Flottorp S . Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010; 79(11):736-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006. View

Vassilev I, Rowsell A, Pope C, Kennedy A, OCathain A, Salisbury C . Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:59. PMC: 4424965. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0238-9. View

Mistry H . Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J Telemed Telecare. 2011; 18(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2011.110505. View

Conde J, De S, Hall R, Johansen E, Meglan D, Peng G . Telehealth innovations in health education and training. Telemed J E Health. 2010; 16(1):103-6. PMC: 2937346. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0152. View

Miller E . The continuing need to investigate the nature and content of teleconsultation communication using interaction analysis techniques. J Telemed Telecare. 2010; 17(2):55-64. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100203. View

Kahn J . Virtual visits--confronting the challenges of telemedicine. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(18):1684-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1500533. View

Lehoux P, Sicotte C, Denis J, Berg M, Lacroix A . The theory of use behind telemedicine: how compatible with physicians' clinical routines?. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 54(6):889-904. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00063-6. View

Bittner A, Wykstra S, Yoshinaga P, Li T . Telerehabilitation for people with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 2014. PMC: 4140242. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011019. View

Wootton R . Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management--an evidence synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012; 18(4):211-20. PMC: 3366107. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2012.120219. View

10.

Sabesan S, Allen D, Caldwell P, Loh P, Mozer R, Komesaroff P . Practical aspects of telehealth: doctor-patient relationship and communication. Intern Med J. 2014; 44(1):101-3. DOI: 10.1111/imj.12323. View

11.

Bauer K . Home-based telemedicine: a survey of ethical issues. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2001; 10(2):137-46. DOI: 10.1017/s0963180101002043. View

12.

Slev V, Mistiaen P, Pasman H, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, van Uden-Kraan C, Francke A . Effects of eHealth for patients and informal caregivers confronted with cancer: A meta-review. Int J Med Inform. 2016; 87:54-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.013. View

13.

Hennemann-Krause L, Lopes A, Araujo J, Petersen E, Nunes R . The assessment of telemedicine to support outpatient palliative care in advanced cancer. Palliat Support Care. 2014; 13(4):1025-30. DOI: 10.1017/S147895151400100X. View

14.

Mclean S, Sheikh A, Cresswell K, Nurmatov U, Mukherjee M, Hemmi A . The impact of telehealthcare on the quality and safety of care: a systematic overview. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e71238. PMC: 3747134. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071238. View

15.

Black A, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Bokun T . The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 2011; 8(1):e1000387. PMC: 3022523. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387. View

16.

Majmudar M, Colucci L, Landman A . The quantified patient of the future: Opportunities and challenges. Healthc (Amst). 2015; 3(3):153-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.02.001. View

17.

Appelboom G, Camacho E, Abraham M, Bruce S, Dumont E, Zacharia B . Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring. Arch Public Health. 2014; 72(1):28. PMC: 4166023. DOI: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-28. View

18.

Andreassen H, Trondsen M, Kummervold P, Gammon D, Hjortdahl P . Patients who use e-mediated communication with their doctor: new constructions of trust in the patient-doctor relationship. Qual Health Res. 2006; 16(2):238-48. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305284667. View

19.

Fairbrother P, Ure J, Hanley J, McCloughan L, Denvir M, Sheikh A . Telemonitoring for chronic heart failure: the views of patients and healthcare professionals - a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2013; 23(1-2):132-44. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12137. View

20.

Entwistle V, Carter S, Cribb A, McCaffery K . Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25(7):741-5. PMC: 2881979. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2. View