Women's Lived Experiences of Learning to Live with Osteoporosis: a Longitudinal Qualitative Study

Overview

Journal BMC Womens Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2017 Mar 11

PMID 28279157

Citations 10

Authors

Carrinna A Hansen

Bo Abrahamsen

Hanne Konradsen

Birthe D Pedersen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: A vast amount of literature exists concerning pharmaceutical adherence in osteoporosis. However, the process of learning to live with osteoporosis over time remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the continued process of how women learn to live with osteoporosis. Our objective was to explore what characterizes women's experiences of living with osteoporosis during the first year after diagnosis, when patients are prescribed anti-osteoporotic treatment, without having experienced an osteoporotic fracture.

Methods: Forty-two narrative qualitative interviews were conducted with fifteen recently diagnosed Danish women. A longitudinal design was chosen since this allows an investigation of the perspective over time. The interviews were conducted in the period of March 2011 to August 2012. Data were analyzed using a phenomenological-hermeneutic interpretation of text. No medical records were available for the researchers. All information with the exception of T-score was self-reported.

Results: The participants' experiences could be described in two key themes developed through the analysis: 1) "To become influenced by the medical treatment" which consisted of two sub-themes "taking the medication", and "discontinuing the medication". 2) "Daily life with osteoporosis", which was characterized by three sub-themes: "interpretation of symptoms", "interpretation of the scan results" and "lifestyle reflections". The results highlighted that learning to live with osteoporosis is a multifaceted process that is highly influenced by the medical treatment. In some cases, this is a prolonged process that can take around one year.

Conclusions: The results suggest a need for improved support for individual women during the complex process of learning to live with osteoporosis. The study adds new knowledge that can be useful for healthcare professionals taking a health-oriented stance when supporting women in self-management of their illness. Further investigations of lived experiences over time in the field of osteoporosis research are therefore needed.

Citing Articles

Bisphosphonate alternative regimens for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: BLAST-OFF, a mixed-methods study.

Sahota O, Narayanasamy M, Bastounis A, Paskins Z, Bishop S, Langley T Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(21):1-169.

PMID: 38634483 PMC: 11056815. DOI: 10.3310/WYPF0472.

Evaluation of an mHealth App on Self-Management of Osteoporosis: Prospective Survey Study.

Bendtsen M, Schonwandt B, Rubaek M, Hitz M Interact J Med Res. 2024; 13:e53995.

PMID: 38557362 PMC: 11019424. DOI: 10.2196/53995.

Impact of postmenopausal osteoporosis on the lives of Omani women and the use of cultural and religious practises to relieve pain: A hermeneutic phenomenological study.

Zadjali F, Brooks J, ONeill T, Stanmore E Health Expect. 2023; 26(6):2278-2292.

PMID: 37493005 PMC: 10632639. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13824.

Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools.

Gates M, Pillay J, Nuspl M, Wingert A, Vandermeer B, Hartling L Syst Rev. 2023; 12(1):51.

PMID: 36945065 PMC: 10029308. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02181-w.

Multidisciplinary expert consensus on secondary fracture prevention in Spain.

Casado E, Blanch J, Carbonell C, Bastida J, Perez-Castrillon J, Canals L Arch Osteoporos. 2021; 16(1):48.

PMID: 33641008 PMC: 7914041. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00878-w.

References

Reventlow S, Hvas L, Malterud K . Making the invisible body visible. Bone scans, osteoporosis and women's bodily experiences. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 62(11):2720-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.009. View

Lindberg M, Andersen S, Christensen H, Kampmann J . [Compliance to drug prescriptions]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2008; 170(22):1912-6. View

Kanis J, McCloskey E, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster J . European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 24(1):23-57. PMC: 3587294. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y. View

Musselwhite K, Cuff L, McGregor L, King K . The telephone interview is an effective method of data collection in clinical nursing research: a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006; 44(6):1064-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.014. View

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

Lau E, Papaioannou A, Dolovich L, Adachi J, Sawka A, Burns S . Patients' adherence to osteoporosis therapy: exploring the perceptions of postmenopausal women. Can Fam Physician. 2008; 54(3):394-402. PMC: 2278357. View

Kralik D, Telford K, Campling F, Crouch P, Koch T, Price K . 'Moving on': the transition to living well with chronic illness. Aust J Holist Nurs. 2009; 12(2):13-22. View

Roerholt C, Eiken P, Abrahamsen B . Initiation of anti-osteoporotic therapy in patients with recent fractures: a nationwide analysis of prescription rates and persistence. Osteoporos Int. 2008; 20(2):299-307. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0651-x. View

Malterud K . Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001; 358(9280):483-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6. View

10.

Angel S . Grasping the experience of the other from an interview: self-transposition in use. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2013; 8:20634. PMC: 3752432. DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v8i0.20634. View

11.

Mazor K, Velten S, Andrade S, Yood R . Older women's views about prescription osteoporosis medication: a cross-sectional, qualitative study. Drugs Aging. 2010; 27(12):999-1008. DOI: 10.2165/11584790-000000000-00000. View

12.

Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman A, Cooper C, Lips P, Bhalla A . Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2003; 15(2):113-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1547-4. View

13.

Lindseth A, Norberg A . A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004; 18(2):145-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00258.x. View

14.

Siris E, Harris S, Rosen C, Barr C, Arvesen J, Abbott T . Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006; 81(8):1013-22. DOI: 10.4065/81.8.1013. View

15.

Kanis J, Gluer C . An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(3):192-202. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050281. View

16.

Cadarette S, Burden A . Measuring and improving adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2010; 22(4):397-403. PMC: 3160417. DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32833ac7fe. View

17.

Kanis J, Melton 3rd L, Christiansen C, JOHNSTON C, Khaltaev N . The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994; 9(8):1137-41. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090802. View

18.

Hansen C, Pedersen B, Konradsen H, Abrahamsen B . Anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark--predictors and demographics of poor refill compliance and poor persistence. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 24(7):2079-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2221-5. View

19.

Wilkins S . Aging, chronic illness and self-concept: a study of women with osteoporosis. J Women Aging. 2001; 13(1):73-92. DOI: 10.1300/J074v13n01_06. View

20.

. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994; 843:1-129. View