» Articles » PMID: 28277202

Facilitative Components of Collaborative Learning: A Review of Nine Health Research Networks

Overview
Journal Healthc Policy
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Mar 10
PMID 28277202
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Collaborative research networks are increasingly used as an effective mechanism for accelerating knowledge transfer into policy and practice. This paper explored the characteristics and collaborative learning approaches of nine health research networks.

Data Sources/study Setting: Semi-structured interviews with representatives from eight diverse US health services research networks conducted between November 2012 and January 2013 and program evaluation data from a ninth.

Study Design: The qualitative analysis assessed each network's purpose, duration, funding sources, governance structure, methods used to foster collaboration, and barriers and facilitators to collaborative learning.

Data Collection: The authors reviewed detailed notes from the interviews to distill salient themes.

Principal Findings: Face-to-face meetings, intentional facilitation and communication, shared vision, trust among members and willingness to work together were key facilitators of collaborative learning. Competing priorities for members, limited funding and lack of long-term support and geographic dispersion were the main barriers to coordination and collaboration across research network members.

Conclusion: The findings illustrate the importance of collaborative learning in research networks and the challenges to evaluating the success of research network functionality. Conducting readiness assessments and developing process and outcome evaluation metrics will advance the design and show the impact of collaborative research networks.

Citing Articles

A Qualitative Exploration of COVID+ Learning Network Webinars: Healthcare Learnings at Pace in a State of Rapid Change.

Morris B, Rayner J, Bartlett C, Fetherstonhaugh D, McArdle E, OBrien A J Prim Care Community Health. 2024; 15():21501319241295672.

PMID: 39526847 PMC: 11555747. DOI: 10.1177/21501319241295672.


What are the features of high-performing quality improvement collaboratives? A qualitative case study of a state-wide collaboratives programme.

McGowan J, Martin G, Krapohl G, Campbell D, Englesbe M, Dimick J BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e076648.

PMID: 38097243 PMC: 10729078. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076648.


Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation.

Bowen J, Ouimet M, Lawaree J, Bielecki J, Rheaume A, Greenberg C Res Eval. 2023; 32(2):188-199.

PMID: 37799115 PMC: 10550251. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac034.


Stakeholder-engaged co-design and implementation of web-based tools to enhance the dissemination and implementation of AHRQ EPC reports.

Shelton E, Mossburg S, Thompson L, Savitz L Learn Health Syst. 2023; 7(2):e10326.

PMID: 37066098 PMC: 10091196. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10326.


Development and Early Experience of a Primary Care Learning Collaborative in a Large Health Care System.

Erickson R, Abu Dabrh A, Chavez A, Cristiani V, DeJesus R, Laabs S J Prim Care Community Health. 2022; 13:21501319221089775.

PMID: 35603490 PMC: 9130813. DOI: 10.1177/21501319221089775.


References
1.
Fleurence R, Curtis L, Califf R, Platt R, Selby J, Brown J . Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 21(4):578-82. PMC: 4078292. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002747. View

2.
Bleeker J, Stalman W, van der Horst H . Evaluating primary care research networks: a review of currently available tools. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010; 23(4):465-75. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090297. View

3.
Schmittdiel J, Grumbach K, Selby J . System-based participatory research in health care: an approach for sustainable translational research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2010; 8(3):256-9. PMC: 2866724. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1117. View

4.
Hall K, Stokols D, Stipelman B, Vogel A, Feng A, Masimore B . Assessing the value of team science: a study comparing center- and investigator-initiated grants. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(2):157-63. PMC: 3586819. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.011. View

5.
Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E, Becker A . Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19:173-202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. View