» Articles » PMID: 28274258

The Performance Scales Disability Measure for Multiple Sclerosis: Use and Sensitivity to Clinically Important Differences

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Mar 10
PMID 28274258
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In 1993, the Performance Scales© was created to assess multi-dimensional disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). This tool has been used in a variety of settings and study designs internationally. The present work provides an overview of the history and psychometric characteristics of the Performance Scales©, reviews its use over the past two decades, and summarizes its responsiveness to subgroup differences.

Methods: A Google Scholar and Ovid search yielded 230 articles citing the Performance Scales©, of which 82 studies used the tool in empirical research. Twelve articles provided sufficient information to enable computation of effect sizes. Forest plots were used to show effect sizes for the overall summary score and by domain by patient demographics, MS disease trajectory, and treatment adherence.

Results: The Performance Scales© evidenced sensitivity to clinically important differences by disease trajectory and age (for selected domains). In contrast, groups distinguished by patient adherence to disease-modifying therapies and ethnicity were relatively small.

Conclusions: The Performance Scales© has been used in a large number of studies since its development, suggesting that this psychometrically sound tool is acknowledged to be a useful tool for MS clinical research. It is recommended that future work include the entire measure, so that the whole-person impact of MS can be characterized and considered in MS outcome research.

Citing Articles

Using Objective and Subjective Measures of Cognition to Predict Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Abilities in Multiple Sclerosis.

Rubel A, DelMastro H, Ruiz J, Lo A, Gromisch E Int J MS Care. 2024; 26(3):113-118.

PMID: 38765299 PMC: 11096855. DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2023-023.


Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Adults with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Family Caregivers.

Halstead E, Stanley J, Fiore D, Mueser K Int J MS Care. 2021; 23(3):93-100.

PMID: 34177380 PMC: 8218589. DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2019-091.


Monitoring Physical Activity with Wearable Technologies.

Tokucoglu F Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2019; 55(Suppl 1):S63-S65.

PMID: 30692859 PMC: 6278615. DOI: 10.29399/npa.23333.

References
1.
Marrie R, Goldman M . Validity of performance scales for disability assessment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2007; 13(9):1176-82. DOI: 10.1177/1352458507078388. View

2.
Amato M, Fratiglioni L, Groppi C, Siracusa G, Amaducci L . Interrater reliability in assessing functional systems and disability on the Kurtzke scale in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1988; 45(7):746-8. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520310052017. View

3.
Noseworthy J, Vandervoort M, Wong C, Ebers G . Interrater variability with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Functional Systems (FS) in a multiple sclerosis clinical trial. The Canadian Cooperation MS Study Group. Neurology. 1990; 40(6):971-5. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.40.6.971. View

4.
Cohen J . A power primer. Psychol Bull. 2009; 112(1):155-9. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155. View

5.
Schwartz C, Fierston S . The two sides of pseudo-bulbar disorder in multiple sclerosis: Comparing one patient's experience with a review of the neurologic literature. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014; 5(4):359-65. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-1995-5410. View