» Articles » PMID: 28270622

Black-swan Events in Animal Populations

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Mar 9
PMID 28270622
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Black swans are improbable events that nonetheless occur-often with profound consequences. Such events drive important transitions in social systems (e.g., banking collapses) and physical systems (e.g., earthquakes), and yet it remains unclear the extent to which ecological population numbers buffer or suffer from such extremes. Here, we estimate the prevalence and direction of black-swan events (heavy-tailed process noise) in 609 animal populations after accounting for population dynamics (productivity, density dependence, and typical stochasticity). We find strong evidence for black-swan events in [Formula: see text]4% of populations. These events occur most frequently for birds (7%), mammals (5%), and insects (3%) and are not explained by any life-history covariates but tend to be driven by external perturbations such as climate, severe winters, predators, parasites, or the combined effect of multiple factors. Black-swan events manifest primarily as population die-offs and crashes (86%) rather than unexpected increases, and ignoring heavy-tailed process noise leads to an underestimate in the magnitude of population crashes. We suggest modelers consider heavy-tailed, downward-skewed probability distributions, such as the skewed Student [Formula: see text] used here, when making forecasts of population abundance. Our results demonstrate the importance of both modeling heavy-tailed downward events in populations, and developing conservation strategies that are robust to ecological surprises.

Citing Articles

Time-travelling pathogens and their risk to ecological communities.

Strona G, Bradshaw C, Cardoso P, Gotelli N, Guillaume F, Manca F PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(7):e1011268.

PMID: 37498846 PMC: 10374110. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011268.


Capturing stochasticity properly is key to understanding the nuances of the Living Planet Index.

Talis E, Lynch H Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(8):1194-1195.

PMID: 37277493 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02086-w.


Geomagnetic disturbance associated with increased vagrancy in migratory landbirds.

Tonelli B, Youngflesh C, Tingley M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):414.

PMID: 36624156 PMC: 9829733. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26586-0.


Abiotic conditions shape spatial and temporal morphological variation in North American birds.

Youngflesh C, Saracco J, Siegel R, Tingley M Nat Ecol Evol. 2022; 6(12):1860-1870.

PMID: 36302998 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01893-x.


Heuristics for the sustainable harvest of wildlife in stochastic social-ecological systems.

Law E, Linnell J, Van Moorter B, Nilsen E PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0260159.

PMID: 34797852 PMC: 8604319. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260159.


References
1.
Doak D, Estes J, Halpern B, Jacob U, Lindberg D, Lovvorn J . Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: are major surprises inevitable?. Ecology. 2008; 89(4):952-61. DOI: 10.1890/07-0965.1. View

2.
Thompson R, Beardall J, Beringer J, Grace M, Sardina P . Means and extremes: building variability into community-level climate change experiments. Ecol Lett. 2013; 16(6):799-806. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12095. View

3.
Sornette D . Predictability of catastrophic events: material rupture, earthquakes, turbulence, financial crashes, and human birth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99 Suppl 1:2522-9. PMC: 128571. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.022581999. View

4.
May R, Levin S, Sugihara G . Complex systems: ecology for bankers. Nature. 2008; 451(7181):893-5. DOI: 10.1038/451893a. View

5.
Knape J, de Valpine P . Are patterns of density dependence in the Global Population Dynamics Database driven by uncertainty about population abundance?. Ecol Lett. 2011; 15(1):17-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01702.x. View