» Articles » PMID: 28270200

Measuring Cochlear Duct Length - a Historical Analysis of Methods and Results

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2017 Mar 9
PMID 28270200
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cochlear Duct Length (CDL) has been an important measure for the development and advancement of cochlear implants. Emerging literature has shown CDL can be used in preoperative settings to select the proper sized electrode and develop customized frequency maps. In order to improve post-operative outcomes, and develop new electrode technologies, methods of measuring CDL must be validated to allow usage in the clinic.

Purpose: The purpose of this review is to assess the various techniques used to calculate CDL and provide the reader with enough information to make an informed decision on how to conduct future studies measuring the CDL.

Results: The methods to measure CDL, the modality used to capture images, and the location of the measurement have all changed as technology evolved. With recent popularity and advancement in computed tomography (CT) imaging in place of histologic sections, measurements of CDL have been focused at the lateral wall (LW) instead of the organ of Corti (OC), due to the inability of CT to view intracochlear structures. After analyzing results from methods such as directly measuring CDL from histology, indirectly reconstructing the shape of the cochlea, and determining CDL based on spiral coefficients, it was determined the three dimensional (3D) reconstruction method is the most reliable method to measure CDL. 3D reconstruction provides excellent visualization of the cochlea and avoids errors evident in other methods. Due to the number of varying methods with varying accuracies, certain guidelines must be followed in the future to allow direct comparison of CDL values between studies.

Conclusion: After summarizing and analyzing the interesting history of CDL measurements, the use of standardized guidelines and the importance of CDL for future cochlear implant developments is emphasized for future studies.

Citing Articles

Surgical Experience in Pre-Operative Measurement of Cochlear Duct Length in Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Ngu C, Tang I, Narayanan P Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025; 77(2):821-827.

PMID: 40065941 PMC: 11890486. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-05259-6.


Investigating Additional Cochlear Parameters: A follow-up systematic review and meta-analysis.

Curtis D, Baumann A, Salmen N, Jeyakumar A J Otol. 2024; 19(3):178-183.

PMID: 39735240 PMC: 11681789. DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2024.03.001.


A novel therapeutic pathway to the human cochlear nerve.

Li H, Agrawal S, Zhu N, Cacciabue D, Rivolta M, Hartley D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26795.

PMID: 39500916 PMC: 11538549. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74661-5.


Automated segmentation of clinical CT scans of the cochlea and analysis of the cochlea's vertical profile.

Siebrecht M, Briaire J, Verbist B, Kalkman R, Frijns J Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e35737.

PMID: 39224385 PMC: 11367034. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35737.


Cochlear Implantation: Small Cochlear Diameter May Indicate Degree of Abnormality.

Altamimi F, Fatemah A, Al-Amro M, Al Montasher A, Al Otaibi S, Al Muhawas F J Int Adv Otol. 2024; 20(2):108-112.

PMID: 39155857 PMC: 11114178. DOI: 10.5152/iao.2024.231191.


References
1.
WILBRAND H, Rask-Andersen H, Gilstring D . The vestibular aqueduct and the para-vestibular canal. An anatomic and roentgenologic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1974; 15(4):337-55. DOI: 10.1177/028418517401500401. View

2.
Wadin K . Radioanatomy of the high jugular fossa and the labyrinthine portion of the facial canal. A radioanatomic and clinical investigation. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1988; 372:29-52. View

3.
Skinner M, Ketten D, Holden L, Harding G, Smith P, Gates G . CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2002; 3(3):332-50. PMC: 3202410. DOI: 10.1007/s101620020013. View

4.
Gstoettner W, Plenk Jr H, Franz P, Hamzavi J, Baumgartner W, Czerny C . Cochlear implant deep electrode insertion: extent of insertional trauma. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997; 117(2):274-7. DOI: 10.3109/00016489709117786. View

5.
Avci E, Nauwelaers T, Lenarz T, Hamacher V, Kral A . Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea. J Comp Neurol. 2014; 522(14):3245-61. PMC: 4265794. DOI: 10.1002/cne.23594. View