» Articles » PMID: 28269854

Integrating Process Mining and Cognitive Analysis to Study EHR Workflow

Overview
Date 2017 Mar 9
PMID 28269854
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There are numerous methods to study workflow. However, few produce the kinds of in-depth analyses needed to understand EHR-mediated workflow. Here we investigated variations in clinicians' EHR workflow by integrating quantitative analysis of patterns of users' EHR-interactions with in-depth qualitative analysis of user performance. We characterized 6 clinicians' patterns of information-gathering using a sequential process-mining approach. The analysis revealed 519 different screen transition patterns performed across 1569 patient cases. No one pattern was followed for more than 10% of patient cases, the 15 most frequent patterns accounted for over half ofpatient cases (53%), and 27% of cases exhibited unique patterns. By triangulating quantitative and qualitative analyses, we found that participants' EHR-interactive behavior was associated with their routine processes, patient case complexity, and EHR default settings. The proposed approach has significant potential to inform resource allocation for observation and training. In-depth observations helped us to explain variation across users.

Citing Articles

Inferring EHR Utilization Workflows through Audit Logs.

Zhang X, Zhao Y, Yan C, Derr T, Chen Y AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023; 2022:1247-1256.

PMID: 37128421 PMC: 10148376.


EHR Conversion on the PreOp Care: A Pre-Post Workflow Comparison.

Zheng L, Duncan B, Kaufman D, Furniss S, Grando A, Poterack K AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021; 2020:1402-1411.

PMID: 33936516 PMC: 8075530.


An interview study with medical scribes on how their work may alleviate clinician burnout through delegated health IT tasks.

Tran B, Rosenbaum K, Zheng K J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021; 28(5):907-914.

PMID: 33576391 PMC: 8068433. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa345.


Studying Workflow and Workarounds in Electronic Health Record-Supported Work to Improve Health System Performance.

Zheng K, Ratwani R, Adler-Milstein J Ann Intern Med. 2020; 172(11 Suppl):S116-S122.

PMID: 32479181 PMC: 8061456. DOI: 10.7326/M19-0871.


Analysing EHR navigation patterns and digital workflows among physicians during ICU pre-rounds.

Coleman C, Gotz D, Eaker S, James E, Bice T, Carson S Health Inf Manag. 2020; 50(3):107-117.

PMID: 32476474 PMC: 8435833. DOI: 10.1177/1833358320920589.


References
1.
Holden R, Carayon P, Gurses A, Hoonakker P, Hundt A, Ozok A . SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics. 2013; 56(11):1669-86. PMC: 3835697. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. View

2.
Koppel R, Metlay J, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Russell Localio A, Kimmel S . Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005; 293(10):1197-203. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1197. View

3.
Zheng K, Padman R, Johnson M, Diamond H . An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 16(2):228-37. PMC: 2649313. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2852. View

4.
Kaufman D, Furniss S, Grando M, Larson D, Burton M . A Sequential Data Analysis Approach to Electronic Health Record Workflow. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 218:120-125. View

5.
Kannampallil T, Franklin A, Mishra R, Almoosa K, Cohen T, Patel V . Understanding the nature of information seeking behavior in critical care: implications for the design of health information technology. Artif Intell Med. 2012; 57(1):21-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.10.002. View