» Articles » PMID: 28267574

Applying Evolutionary Genetics to Developmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment

Overview
Journal Reprod Toxicol
Date 2017 Mar 8
PMID 28267574
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evolutionary thinking continues to challenge our views on health and disease. Yet, there is a communication gap between evolutionary biologists and toxicologists in recognizing the connections among developmental pathways, high-throughput screening, and birth defects in humans. To increase our capability in identifying potential developmental toxicants in humans, we propose to apply evolutionary genetics to improve the experimental design and data interpretation with various in vitro and whole-organism models. We review five molecular systems of stress response and update 18 consensual cell-cell signaling pathways that are the hallmark for early development, organogenesis, and differentiation; and revisit the principles of teratology in light of recent advances in high-throughput screening, big data techniques, and systems toxicology. Multiscale systems modeling plays an integral role in the evolutionary approach to cross-species extrapolation. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative bioinformatics are both valuable tools in identifying and validating the molecular initiating events that account for adverse developmental outcomes in humans. The discordance of susceptibility between test species and humans (ontogeny) reflects their differences in evolutionary history (phylogeny). This synthesis not only can lead to novel applications in developmental toxicity and risk assessment, but also can pave the way for applying an evo-devo perspective to the study of developmental origins of health and disease.

Citing Articles

Laboratory and physiological aspects of substitute metazoan models for in vivo pharmacotoxicological analysis.

Ferreira P, Ramos C, Filho J, Conceicao M, Almeida M, do Nascimento Rodrigues D Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024; 398(2):1315-1339.

PMID: 39298017 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03437-5.


Toxicity by descent: A comparative approach for chemical hazard assessment.

Colbourne J, Shaw J, Sostare E, Rivetti C, Derelle R, Barnett R Environ Adv. 2024; 9:100287.

PMID: 39228468 PMC: 11370884. DOI: 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100287.


Molecular Evolution of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling Pathway Genes.

Bhalla D, van Noort V J Mol Evol. 2023; 91(5):628-646.

PMID: 37392220 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-023-10124-1.


Xenobiotic metabolism and transport in .

Hartman J, Widmayer S, Bergemann C, King D, Morton K, Romersi R J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2021; 24(2):51-94.

PMID: 33616007 PMC: 7958427. DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2021.1884921.


Evolutionary concepts can benefit both fundamental research and applied research in toxicology (A comment on Brady et al. 2017).

Hahn M Evol Appl. 2019; 12(2):350-352.

PMID: 30697345 PMC: 6346646. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12695.


References
1.
Dang Z, Cheng Y, Chen H, Cui Y, Yin H, Traas T . Evaluation of the Daphnia magna reproduction test for detecting endocrine disruptors. Chemosphere. 2012; 88(4):514-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.012. View

2.
Harima Y, Imayoshi I, Shimojo H, Kobayashi T, Kageyama R . The roles and mechanism of ultradian oscillatory expression of the mouse Hes genes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014; 34:85-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.04.038. View

3.
Yang Z, Rannala B . Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(5):303-14. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3186. View

4.
Tillier E, Charlebois R . The human protein coevolution network. Genome Res. 2009; 19(10):1861-71. PMC: 2765286. DOI: 10.1101/gr.092452.109. View

5.
Hashimshony T, Feder M, Levin M, Hall B, Yanai I . Spatiotemporal transcriptomics reveals the evolutionary history of the endoderm germ layer. Nature. 2014; 519(7542):219-22. PMC: 4359913. DOI: 10.1038/nature13996. View