» Articles » PMID: 28261013

Unified Phase Variables of Relative Degree Two for Human Locomotion

Overview
Date 2017 Mar 7
PMID 28261013
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A starting point to achieve stable locomotion is synchronizing the leg joint kinematics during the gait cycle. Some biped robots parameterize a nonlinear controller (e.g., input-output feedback linearization) whose main objective is to track specific kinematic trajectories as a function of a single mechanical variable (i.e., a phase variable) in order to allow the robot to walk. A phase variable capable of parameterizing the entire gait cycle, the hip phase angle, has been used to control wearable robots and was recently shown to provide a robust representation of the phase of human gait. However, this unified phase variable relies on hip velocity, which is difficult to measure in real-time and prevents the use of derivative corrections in phase-based controllers for wearable robots. One derivative of this phase variable yields accelerations (i.e., the equations of motion), so the system is said to be relative degree-one. This means that there are states of the system that cannot be controlled. The goal of this paper is to offer relative degree-two alternatives to the hip phase angle and examine their robustness for parameterizing human gait.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of controllers for augmentative hip exoskeletons and their effects on metabolic cost of walking: explicit versus implicit synchronization.

Manzoori A, Malatesta D, Primavesi J, Ijspeert A, Bouri M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1324587.

PMID: 38532879 PMC: 10963600. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1324587.


An Individual Prosthesis Control Method with Human Subjective Choices.

Sun L, Ma H, An H, Wei Q Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(2).

PMID: 38392123 PMC: 10887058. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9020077.


A Review of Current State-of-the-Art Control Methods for Lower-Limb Powered Prostheses.

Gehlhar R, Tucker M, Young A, Ames A Annu Rev Control. 2023; 55:142-164.

PMID: 37635763 PMC: 10449377. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.003.


Seamless and intuitive control of a powered prosthetic leg using deep neural network for transfemoral amputees.

Kim M, Simon A, Hargrove L Wearable Technol. 2023; 3.

PMID: 37041885 PMC: 10085575. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2022.19.


Control Framework for Sloped Walking With a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis.

Anil Kumar N, Patrick S, Hong W, Hur P Front Neurorobot. 2022; 15:790060.

PMID: 35087389 PMC: 8786733. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.790060.


References
1.
Grillner S, Rossignol S . On the initiation of the swing phase of locomotion in chronic spinal cats. Brain Res. 1978; 146(2):269-77. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90973-3. View

2.
Gregg R, Lenzi T, Fey N, Hargrove L, Sensinger J . Experimental effective shape control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2013; 2013:6650413. DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650413. View

3.
Simon A, Ingraham K, Fey N, Finucane S, Lipschutz R, Young A . Configuring a powered knee and ankle prosthesis for transfemoral amputees within five specific ambulation modes. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e99387. PMC: 4051756. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099387. View

4.
Sup F, Bohara A, Goldfarb M . Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis. Int J Rob Res. 2009; 27(2):263-273. PMC: 2773553. DOI: 10.1177/0278364907084588. View

5.
Murray S, Ha K, Goldfarb M . An assistive controller for a lower-limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation after stroke, and preliminary assessment thereof. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015; 2014:4083-6. PMC: 4479172. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944521. View