» Articles » PMID: 28260012

Novel Quantitative Analysis of the S100P Protein Combined with Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Overview
Journal Oncol Rep
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Mar 6
PMID 28260012
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Specimens obtained with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) are often tiny and fragmented leading to an inconclusive and doubtful diagnosis. To overcome the limitations of EUS-FNA in the cytological diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCA), we evaluated whether quantification of the S100P protein combined with EUS-FNA reliably discriminated between PCA and benign pancreatic lesions (BPL). A high sensitivity sandwich ELISA for S100P protein was developed to aid in the detection of PCA in small samples obtained using EUS-FNA. After experimental verification of the sandwich ELISA with cell lines and mouse xenograft tumors, 27 consecutive patients with suspicious PCA who underwent EUS-FNA were enrolled in the present study examining the combination of S100P protein assessment and EUS-FNA cytology. The concentration of the S100P protein in EUS-FNA samples from the PCA group was significantly higher than that in the BPL group (P=0.04). Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we determined the S100P protein cut-off value for PCA diagnosis to be 99.8 ng/ml. The S100P protein levels combined with EUS-FNA cytology to detect PCA showed the following diagnostic values: sensitivity, 94.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 75.7-99.1%]; specificity, 88.9% (95% CI, 51.8-99.7%); positive predictive value, 94.4% (95% CI, 72.7-99.9%); negative predictive value, 88.9% (95% CI, 51.8-99.7%); accuracy, 92.6% (95% CI, 75.7‑99.1%); and area under the curve, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.79-1.00). We established a novel quantitative analysis for the S100P protein in EUS-FNA samples which, when combined with EUS-FNA cytology, could provide promising results for the reliable diagnosis of PCA.

Citing Articles

Innovative Experimental Ultrasound and US-Related Techniques Using the Murine Model in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Coppola A, Grasso D, Fontana F, Piacentino F, Minici R, Lagana D J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137745 PMC: 10743777. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247677.


Diagnostic Dilemma of Biliopancreatic Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography.

Kanazawa K, Chiba M, Kato M, Kinoshita Y, Akasu T, Matsui H Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(8).

PMID: 36010332 PMC: 9406750. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081983.


S100 Proteins in Pancreatic Cancer: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.

Wu Y, Zhou Q, Guo F, Chen M, Tao X, Dong D Front Oncol. 2021; 11:711180.

PMID: 34527585 PMC: 8435722. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.711180.


A quarter century of EUS-FNA: Progress, milestones, and future directions.

Cazacu I, Luzuriaga Chavez A, Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Bhutani M Endosc Ultrasound. 2018; 7(3):141-160.

PMID: 29941723 PMC: 6032705. DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_19_18.


Endoscopic Ultrasound Imaging for Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neoplasms: A 7-Year Study in a Chinese Population.

Cui B, Fang W, Khan S, Li S, Chang Y, Wang B Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:3653-3660.

PMID: 29853714 PMC: 6007492. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.907516.

References
1.
Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Bruns D, Gatsonis C, Glasziou P, Irwig L . STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Clin Chem. 2015; 61(12):1446-52. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280. View

2.
Yasuda I, Iwashita T, Doi S . Tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of various pancreatic lesions. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013; 21(5):E29-33. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.60. View

3.
Pitman M, Layfield L . Guidelines for pancreaticobiliary cytology from the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology: A review. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014; 122(6):399-411. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21427. View

4.
Hartwig W, Schneider L, Diener M, Bergmann F, Buchler M, Werner J . Preoperative tissue diagnosis for tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg. 2008; 96(1):5-20. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6407. View

5.
Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz J, Abdulkader I, Larino-Noia J, Eugenyeva E, Lozano-Leon A . Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011; 106(9):1705-10. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.119. View