» Articles » PMID: 28259846

The Impact of a Federal Cigarette Minimum Pack Price Policy on Cigarette Use in the USA

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 Mar 6
PMID 28259846
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Increasing cigarette prices reduce cigarette use. The US Food and Drug Administration has the authority to regulate the sale and promotion-and therefore the price-of tobacco products.

Objective: To examine the potential effect of federal minimum price regulation on the sales of cigarettes in the USA.

Method: We used yearly state-level data from the Tax Burden on Tobacco and other sources to model per capita cigarette sales as a function of price. We used the fitted model to compare the status quo sales with counterfactual scenarios in which a federal minimum price was set. The minimum price scenarios ranged from $0 to $12.

Results: The estimated price effect in our model was comparable with that found in the literature. Our counterfactual analyses suggested that the impact of a minimum price requirement could range from a minimal effect at the $4 level to a reduction of 5.7 billion packs sold per year and 10 million smokers at the $10 level.

Conclusion: A federal minimum price policy has the potential to greatly benefit tobacco control and public health by uniformly increasing the price of cigarettes and by eliminating many price-reducing strategies currently available to both sellers and consumers.

Citing Articles

Reactions to Pictorial and Text Cigarette Pack Warning Labels among Chinese Smokers.

Wang L, Yao X, Wang G, Du K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18).

PMID: 36141520 PMC: 9517269. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811253.


The Short-Term and Long-Term Associations Between Receiving Tobacco Discounts or Coupons and Smoking Cessation Among U.S. Adult Cigarette Smokers With Intention to Quit.

Wang Y, Duan Z, Weaver S, Self-Brown S, Ashley D, Emery S Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 25(4):699-708.

PMID: 36124654 PMC: 10032185. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac216.


Tobacco Couponing: A Systematic Review of Exposures and Effects on Tobacco Initiation and Cessation.

Liber A, Sanchez-Romero L, Cadham C, Yuan Z, Li Y, Oh H Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 24(10):1523-1533.

PMID: 35143678 PMC: 9575981. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac037.


Research on lung cancer and its funding, 2004-2018.

Begum M, Urquhart I, Lewison G, Fouad F, Sullivan R Ecancermedicalscience. 2020; 14:1132.

PMID: 33281924 PMC: 7685768. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1132.


A framework for identifying and mitigating the equity harms of COVID-19 policy interventions.

Glover R, van Schalkwyk M, Akl E, Kristjannson E, Lotfi T, Petkovic J J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 128:35-48.

PMID: 32526461 PMC: 7280094. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.004.


References
1.
Golden S, Smith M, Feighery E, Roeseler A, Rogers T, Ribisl K . Beyond excise taxes: a systematic review of literature on non-tax policy approaches to raising tobacco product prices. Tob Control. 2015; 25(4):377-85. PMC: 4941206. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052294. View

2.
Pesko M, Licht A, Kruger J . Cigarette price minimization strategies in the United States: price reductions and responsiveness to excise taxes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013; 15(11):1858-66. PMC: 3790627. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt068. View

3.
Gilmore A, Branston J, Sweanor D . The case for OFSMOKE: how tobacco price regulation is needed to promote the health of markets, government revenue and the public. Tob Control. 2010; 19(5):423-30. PMC: 2981493. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2009.034470. View

4.
Contreary K, Chattopadhyay S, Hopkins D, Chaloupka F, Forster J, Grimshaw V . Economic Impact of Tobacco Price Increases Through Taxation: A Community Guide Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(5):800-808. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.026. View

5.
Grace R, Kivell B, Laugesen M . Predicting decreases in smoking with a cigarette purchase task: evidence from an excise tax rise in New Zealand. Tob Control. 2014; 24(6):582-7. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051594. View