» Articles » PMID: 28259694

Techniques for the Provocation, Localization, and Ablation of Non-pulmonary Vein Triggers for Atrial Fibrillation

Overview
Journal Heart Rhythm
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Mar 6
PMID 28259694
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The end point of current catheter-based ablation approaches for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the elimination of all the possible triggers with the least amount of ablation necessary. Once all the triggers have been eliminated, the incremental value of any additional lesion sets remains to be proven. Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation approaches for eliminating AF triggers. However, up to 11% of patients demonstrate reproducible sustained AF initiation from non-PV foci. In these patients, triggers can typically be elicited using standardized induction protocols, which include cardioversion of spontaneous and/or induced AF and infusion of high-dose isoproterenol. Non-PV triggers typically arise from discrete anatomical structures that include the mitral and tricuspid periannular regions, the crista terminalis and Eustachian ridge, the interatrial septum, the left atrial (LA) posterior wall, the left atrial appendage (LAA), and other thoracic veins such as the superior vena cava, the coronary sinus, and the ligament of Marshall. Localization of non-PV foci involves a detailed analysis of specific intra-atrial activation sequences using multipolar catheters in standard atrial locations coupled with information from the surface electrocardiogram P wave when possible. Multipolar catheters positioned along the coronary sinus and crista terminalis/superior vena cava region together with direct recordings from the right and left PVs allow a quick localization of non-PV foci. Elimination of non-PV triggers by means of focal ablation at the site of origin or isolation of arrhythmogenic structures (eg, LA posterior wall or superior vena cava) has been associated with improved arrhythmia-free survival.

Citing Articles

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(6):1217-1354.

PMID: 39669937 PMC: 11632303. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13082.


Atrial pace mapping using automatic intracardiac pattern matching for ablation of non-sustained atrial tachycardia: a case report.

Lian E, Willert S, Kruger R, Demming T, Frank D, Maslova V HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2024; 10(11):794-797.

PMID: 39664663 PMC: 11628854. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.07.022.


Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Optimized Linear Ablation vs Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone for Persistent AF: The PROMPT-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sang C, Liu Q, Lai Y, Xia S, Jiang R, Li S JAMA. 2024; 333(5):381-389.

PMID: 39556379 PMC: 11574720. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.24438.


Do extra-pulmonary triggers or autonomic neural activity affect rhythm control by anti-arrhythmic drugs in patients with post-ablation atrial fibrillation recurrence?.

Park H, Yu H, Kim D, Park J, Kim T, Uhm J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1426531.

PMID: 39434852 PMC: 11491320. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1426531.


Substrate Modification for Atrial Fibrillation Induced by Mechanical Irritation That May Be Associated With Non-Pulmonary Vein Foci.

Sonoda K, Hyakutake S, Furukawa K, Otsuka K, Takei A, Maemura K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024; 47(12):1632-1636.

PMID: 39283200 PMC: 11630806. DOI: 10.1111/pace.15073.