» Articles » PMID: 28259167

Diagnostic Accuracy of Arthroscopic Biopsy in Periprosthetic Infections of the Hip

Overview
Journal Eur J Med Res
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 6
PMID 28259167
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of a low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) prior to revision surgery can be challenging, despite paramount importance for further treatment. Arthroscopic biopsy of synovial and periprosthetic tissue with subsequent microbiological and histological examination can be beneficial but its specific diagnostic value has not been clearly defined.

Methods: 20 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous synovial fluid aspiration as well as arthroscopic biopsy due to suspected PJI of the hip and subsequent one- or two-stage revision surgery at our institution between January 2012 and May 2015 were enrolled. Indication was based on the criteria (1) history of PJI and increased levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP), (2) suspicious cell count and differential but negative bacterial culture in synovial aspirate, (3) early loosening (<less than 2 years), or (4) persisting pain without loosening but history of a PJI. At least two criteria had to be fulfilled in order to perform an arthroscopic biopsy.

Results: Best overall diagnostic value was identified for arthroscopic biopsy and a combination of bacteriological and histological analysis with a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 100% and accuracy of 95%. Bacteriological assessment of synovial aspirate revealed a sensitivity of 50.0%, specificity of 91.7%, and accuracy of 75%. ESR and CRP yielded a sensitivity of 75.0% for either hematologic test and specificities of 87.5 and 66.7%, respectively.

Conclusions: In conclusion, our data indicate that arthroscopic biopsy is superior to ESR and CRP as well as joint aspiration and their combinations. Concurrent microbiological and histological examination of the biopsy specimens allows for identification of the causative pathogen and its susceptibility pattern in order to preoperatively plan the surgical strategy as well as the antibiotic regimen. Moreover, intraarticular mechanical failure can be detected during hip arthroscopy emphasizing its diagnostic value. Level II diagnostic study.

Citing Articles

C9 immunostaining as a tissue biomarker for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis.

Meinshausen A, Farber J, Illiger S, Macor P, Lohmann C, Bertrand J Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1112188.

PMID: 36895567 PMC: 9989178. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1112188.


Reliable Diagnostic Tests and Thresholds for Preoperative Diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Arthritis Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Tang H, Xu J, Yuan W, Wang Y, Yue B, Qu X Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(11):2822-2836.

PMID: 36181336 PMC: 9627080. DOI: 10.1111/os.13500.


Diagnostic value of open incisional biopsies in suspected, difficult-to-diagnose periprosthetic hip joint infection prior to revision surgery.

Simon M, Beyersdorff J, Strahl A, Rolvien T, Ruther W, Niemeier A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 143(3):1663-1670.

PMID: 35348871 PMC: 9957879. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04402-8.


The role of biopsy in diagnosing infection after hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Li C, Margaryan D, Perka C, Trampuz A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 143(4):1779-1792.

PMID: 35061082 PMC: 10030426. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04323-y.


The significance of synovial biopsy in the diagnostic workup of the low-grade periprosthetic joint infection of shoulder arthroplasty.

Mederake M, Hofmann U, Fink B Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 142(11):3157-3164.

PMID: 33991235 PMC: 9522757. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03932-x.


References
1.
Otterness I . The value of C-reactive protein measurement in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1994; 24(2):91-104. DOI: 10.1016/s0049-0172(05)80003-4. View

2.
Fink B, Gebhard A, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schafer P . High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 471(3):956-64. PMC: 3563795. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2474-5. View

3.
Somme D, Ziza J, Desplaces N, Chicheportiche V, Chazerain P, Leonard P . Contribution of routine joint aspiration to the diagnosis of infection before hip revision surgery. Joint Bone Spine. 2003; 70(6):489-95. DOI: 10.1016/s1297-319x(03)00058-7. View

4.
Fehring T, Cohen B . Aspiration as a guide to sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11(5):543-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80107-0. View

5.
Spangehl M, Masri B, OConnell J, Duncan C . Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(5):672-83. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199905000-00008. View