» Articles » PMID: 28253887

Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Gait Training in Children with Cerebral Palsy: a Bicenter, Pragmatic, Randomized, Cross-over Trial (PeLoGAIT)

Overview
Journal BMC Pediatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2017 Mar 4
PMID 28253887
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Walking ability is a priority for many children with cerebral palsy (CP) and their parents when considering domains of importance regarding treatment interventions. Partial body-weight supported treadmill training has become an established therapeutic treatment approach to address this demand. Further, new robotic rehabilitation technologies have increasingly been implemented in the clinical setting to allow for longer training sessions with increased step repetitions while maintaining a consistent movement pattern. But the current evidence about its clinical effectiveness in pediatric rehabilitation is weak. The aim of this research project is therefore to investigate the effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training on improvements of functional gait parameters in children with cerebral palsy.

Methods/design: Children aged 6 to 18 years with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy who are able to walk at least 14 m with or without walking aids will be recruited in two pediatric therapy centers in Switzerland. Within a pragmatic cross-over design with randomized treatment sequences, they perform 5 weeks of robot-assisted gait training (three times per week with a maximum of 45 min walking time each) or a 5-week period of standard treatment, which is individually customized to the needs of the child and usually consists of 1-2 sessions of physiotherapy per week and additional hippotherapy, circuit training as well as occupational therapy as necessary. Both interventions take place in an outpatient setting. The percentage score of the dimension E of the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) as primary outcome as well as the dimension D of the GMFM-88, 6-minute and 10-meter walking tests as secondary outcomes are assessed before and at the end of each intervention period. Additionally, a 5-week follow-up assessment is scheduled for the children who are assigned to the standard treatment first. Treatment effects, period effects as well as follow-up effects are analyzed with paired analyses and independent test statistics are used to assess carry-over effects.

Discussion: Although robot-assisted gait training has become an established treatment option to address gait impairments, evidence for its effectiveness is vague. This pragmatic trial will provide important information on its effects under clinical outpatient conditions.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00887848 . Registered 23 April 2009.

Citing Articles

New Technological Approaches in Occupational Therapy for Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.

Martinez-Rodriguez L, Garcia-Bravo C, Garcia-Bravo S, Salcedo-Perez-Juana M, Perez-Corrales J Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(5).

PMID: 40077021 PMC: 11899563. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13050459.


Benefits of robotic gait assistance with ATLAS 2030 in children with cerebral palsy.

Castro P, Marti M, Olivan-Blazquez B, Bonar N, Garcia V, Gascon-Santos S Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1398044.

PMID: 39135857 PMC: 11318455. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1398044.


Parental involvement in robot-mediated intervention: a systematic review.

Piccolo A, De Domenico C, Di Cara M, Settimo C, Corallo F, Leonardi S Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1355901.

PMID: 39049952 PMC: 11267593. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355901.


Efficacy of a Soft Robotic Exoskeleton to Improve Lower Limb Motor Function in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hui Z, Qi W, Zhang Y, Wang M, Zhang J, Li D Brain Sci. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38790405 PMC: 11118818. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050425.


Robot-assisted gait training improves walking and cerebral connectivity in children with unilateral cerebral palsy.

Julien L, Moreau-Pernet G, Rochette E, Lemaire J, Pontier B, Bourrand S Pediatr Res. 2024; 96(5):1306-1315.

PMID: 38769400 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03240-1.


References
1.
Druzbicki M, Rusek W, Snela S, Dudek J, Szczepanik M, Zak E . Functional effects of robotic-assisted locomotor treadmill thearapy in children with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2013; 45(4):358-63. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1114. View

2.
Tefertiller C, Pharo B, Evans N, Winchester P . Efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for walking training in neurological disorders: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48(4):387-416. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.04.0055. View

3.
Barbeau H, Visintin M . Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(10):1458-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00361-7. View

4.
Moseley A, Stark A, Cameron I, Pollock A . Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (4):CD002840. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002840.pub2. View

5.
Ganesan M, Sathyaprabha T, Pal P, Gupta A . Partial Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training in Patients With Parkinson Disease: Impact on Gait and Clinical Manifestation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96(9):1557-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.05.007. View