» Articles » PMID: 28246144

Population Trends in the 10-year Incidence and Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in the UK: a Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 2004-2014

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 2
PMID 28246144
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To describe trends in the incidence and prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the UK by diabetes type, age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, region and calendar year.

Design: Cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

Setting: UK primary care.

Participants: 7.7 million patients ≥12 contributing to the CPRD from 2004 to 2014.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Age-standardised prevalence and incidence of diabetes, DR and severe DR (requiring photocoagulation) by calendar year and population subgroup. Relative risk of developing DR and severe DR by population subgroup.

Results: The prevalence of DR was 48.4% in the population type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (14 846/30 657) and 28.3% (95 807/338 390) in the population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Prevalence of DR remained stable in people with T2DM and decreased in people with T1DM. Screening for DR increased over time for patients with T2DM and remained static for patients with T1DM Incidence of DR increased in parallel with the incidence of T2DM in both diabetic populations. Among patients with T2DM, relative risk of DR varied significantly by region, was increased for older age groups and in men compared with women, with risk of severe DR increased in South Asian groups and more deprived groups. Relative risk of DR for patients with T1DM varied by age and region, but not by gender, ethnic group or deprivation.

Conclusions: This is the largest study to date examining the burden of DR in the UK. Regional disparities in incidence may relate to differences in screening delivery and disease ascertainment. Evidence that deprivation and ethnicity are associated with a higher risk of severe DR highlights a significant potential health inequality. Findings from this study will have implications for professionals working in the diabetes and sight loss sectors, particularly to inform approaches for diagnosis of retinopathy and campaigning to better tackle the disease for at risk groups.

Citing Articles

A Markov model assessing the cost-effectiveness of various anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs and panretinal photocoagulation for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Luckham K, Tebbs H, Claxton L, Burgess P, Dinah C, Lois N Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39910280 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03641-4.


Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy Among Diabetic Patients from Northeastern Bulgaria.

Zlatarova Z, Hristova E, Bliznakova K, Atanasova V, Yaneva Z, Koseva D Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(20).

PMID: 39451664 PMC: 11507363. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14202340.


Scoring and validation of a simple model for predicting diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes based on a meta-analysis approach of 21 cohorts.

Guo H, Han F, Qu J, Pan C, Sun B, Chen L Ann Med. 2024; 56(1):2413920.

PMID: 39392052 PMC: 11485693. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2413920.


Real-World Outcomes of Faricimab Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema.

Quah N, Javed K, Arbi L, Hanumunthadu D Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:1479-1490.

PMID: 38827773 PMC: 11141735. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S463624.


Referrals for proliferative diabetic retinopathy from two UK diabetic retinopathy screening services: a 10-year analysis of visual outcomes, requirement for vitrectomy, and mortality.

Sadiq S, Lee C, Charmer B, Jones E, Habib M, Sandinha M Eye (Lond). 2024; 38(13):2561-2567.

PMID: 38653749 PMC: 11385226. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03078-1.


References
1.
Sivaprasad S, Gupta B, Gulliford M, Dodhia H, Mohamed M, Nagi D . Ethnic variations in the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in people with diabetes attending screening in the United Kingdom (DRIVE UK). PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e32182. PMC: 3297598. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032182. View

2.
Hull S, Mathur R, Badrick E, Robson J, Boomla K . Recording ethnicity in primary care: assessing the methods and impact. Br J Gen Pract. 2011; 61(586):e290-4. PMC: 3080234. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X572544. View

3.
Khunti K, Gadsby R, Millett C, Majeed A, Davies M . Quality of diabetes care in the UK: comparison of published quality-of-care reports with results of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for Diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007; 24(12):1436-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02276.x. View

4.
Younis N, Broadbent D, Vora J, Harding S . Incidence of sight-threatening retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes in the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study: a cohort study. Lancet. 2003; 361(9353):195-200. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12267-2. View

5.
Konig M, Lamos E, Stein S, Davis S . An insight into the recent diabetes trials: what is the best approach to prevent macrovascular and microvascular complications?. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2013; 9(5):371-81. DOI: 10.2174/15733998113099990077. View