» Articles » PMID: 28243769

[Ureterorenoscopy]

Overview
Journal Urologe A
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Mar 1
PMID 28243769
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ureterorenoscopy (URS) is a minimally invasive treatment option for removal of kidney stones, which has gained importance in this field over the past two decades. This technique has replaced extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) stone surgery for many indications. It is also particularly important in the diagnostics and treatment for tumors of the upper urinary tract. This article describes the indications, surgical technique and management of complications of URS.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Inflammatory Parameters Following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) and Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones.

Kovacevic Prstojevic J, Hasanbegovic M, Alic J, Misanovic V, Lujinovic A, Metovic A Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e51882.

PMID: 38327930 PMC: 10849768. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51882.


["We're going to place a ureteral stent …" : Development and use of the terms stent and splint by German-speaking urologists].

Moll F, Leissner J, Halling T Urologe A. 2018; 57(7):836-845.

PMID: 29946936 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0693-4.


[Interrater reliability and clinical impact of the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) grading system for ureteral lesions after ureteroscopy : Results of the German prospective multicenter BUSTER project].

May M, Schonthaler M, Gilfrich C, Wolff I, Peter J, Miernik A Urologe A. 2018; 57(2):172-180.

PMID: 29322235 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0565-3.

References
1.
Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T, Herrmann T, Gross A . Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology. 2012; 80(6):1214-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.064. View

2.
Gillan A, El-Mokadem I, Rai B, Lang S, Alcorn J, Shams Ud Din A . Carcinoma in situ is significantly underdetected by prenephroureterectomy ureteroscopy in the management of upper tract urothelial cancers. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:547586. PMC: 4310489. DOI: 10.1155/2015/547586. View

3.
Bach T, Netsch C, Herrmann T, Gross A . Objective assessment of working tool impact on irrigation flow and visibility in flexible ureterorenoscopes. J Endourol. 2011; 25(7):1125-9. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0739. View

4.
Shin R, Lipkin M, Preminger G . Disposable devices for RIRS: where do we stand in 2013? What do we need in the future?. World J Urol. 2014; 33(2):241-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1368-4. View

5.
de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, Keeley F, Matsuda T, Pearle M . The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol. 2013; 28(2):131-9. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0436. View